Page 8 of 29 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 290

Thread: Compact and Lightweight, Scout-like, .308 Bolt Gun

  1. #71
    Site Supporter vaspence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Richmond VA
    Quote Originally Posted by DacoRoman View Post
    Do you mean single round top loading? The T3X can't single round top load? I'm wondering if the Tikka CTR can. That is a great point to bring up.

    EDIT: I'm totally going to check out the Model 70 FW compact; what barrel length?
    Just pulled my T3x .308 out of safe and it lets me load a single round with the empty mag in.

    My T3 (not X) CTR .308 will also allow single loading on empty mag but not as reliably as the T3.

    ETA - Apologies did not realize you meant loading the magazine.
    Last edited by vaspence; 09-19-2019 at 08:53 PM.

  2. #72
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North AZ
    Quote Originally Posted by 1911Nut View Post
    I don't recall any prescribed top loading in that class, but it's been a while. I do remember using top loading ("shoot one, load one") technique when we shot the "Scrambler" drill, with quite a bit of shooting and movement between individual shots.

    I looked back in my old records and found an AAR I submitted to another forum that I used to participate in regularly. Here it is:




    I recently returned from the “Scout Rifle Class” conducted at Gunsite on April 25-27. While I have obtained previous training at Gunsite and other locations with the pistol, shotgun, and carbine, this was my very first training of any kind with a rifle.

    I thought I would share my experiences to the best of my recollection with the list. Most of the list members have far more rifle experience than I will undoubtedly ever acquire for the balance of my life, so bear with me (or hit the “Delete” key) if the report is boring, too low-level, or redundant.

    This was the first rifle class ever conducted at Gunsite that was conducted exclusively for the “scout” configuration rifle. The class was three days in duration and there were no grades provided. Students who successfully completed the course were provided with a “Certificate of Training”, exactly as was done in the first (and I believe only) “Pistol Tune Up” class Gunsite conducted in May 2009, that I also attended.

    Instructors were Il Ling New (Rangemaster) and Mario Marchman.

    There were eight shooters from seven states enrolled in the class. States represented were: Alaska, California, Oregon, Arizona, New Mexico, Kansas, and Ohio. In addition to me, there was only one additional student in attendance who had no previous rifle training experience. Several of the shooters had completed 270 Rifle, Precision Rifle, Hunter Prep (and perhaps additional) classes at Gunsite, and all had trained previously under the tutelage of Il Ling. Three or four of the shooters were what I choose to call “serious” riflemen, with extensive experience. One gentleman had never owned a rifle in his life until he purchased the Scout Rifle approximately six months before the class.

    Firearms were:
    4 Steyr Scouts all in caliber .308 Winchester
    1 Savage Scout in caliber .308 Winchester
    1 Ruger Scout in caliber .308 Winchester
    1 custom-built Winchester Model 70 Scout in caliber .308 Winchester
    1 Browning BLR Scout in caliber .450 Marlin

    The weather turned out to be a challenge at times, but did not interfere with the learning experience or the fun. While temperatures were pleasant (low 40’s in the morning and high 60’s in the afternoon), we experienced quite windy conditions on Monday and Tuesday, especially Tuesday, when the wind seldom slowed below 25 MPH and was frequently gusting to 40 or more MPH. A couple of times, wind gusts snapped the wooden support legs off the targets and they all had to be rebuilt. This contributed to a renewed interest (at least on my part) in the proper use of the Ching sling when shooting from prone and intermediate positions.

    As has always been my experience at Gunsite, safety was of the utmost importance and was constantly stressed and enforced by Il Ling and Mario. There were no major issues that occurred to my knowledge, and the safety reminder that I heard repeated most often was when Il Ling and Mario reminded students to keep their rifles slung properly.

    Since I was doing my best to maximize my learning experience, I didn’t keep a journal of events in the order they transpired, so as I describe some of the class activities, they will not appear in the order they occurred.

    The first morning we spent classroom time reviewing equipment, carry methods, shooting basics, safety rules, and some shooting basics.

    A significant amount of time was spent shooting from field positions at 100 and 200 yards to confirm zero. Two shooters had a few problems, but they were corrected with some attention. The Ruger Scout shooter’s issue turned out to be weapon-related, and I will touch on that subject in a bit. Most everyone else seemed to make only minor adjustments to their optics, if any. I personally cranked in one MOA to the left and one MOA “up” on my Leupold Scout Scope after shooting at 200 yards.

    We spent time shooting at 25 to 50 yards from standing position, with shooter movement built into the exercises. We began with single shots on target, then moved to two shots, then three, from various positions. At times, single targets were engaged, and at time two targets were engaged. We learned to engage targets from slung position, from “high ready” position, and from “low ready” position. I had always carried a rifle when hunting in the field in the “American Carry” position, but quickly adapted to the “European Carry”, as I found it easiest to acquire and dismount, and felt I had better control of the rifle from that position.

    A bit of time was spent reviewing movement while maintaining the fighting stance and balance, as I am familiar with from pistol, shotgun, and carbine training. Several drills were conducted on moving targets, as well as steel pepper popper targets at ranges varying from 25 to 50 yards on the movers and out to 300 yards on the steel targets. All the shooters were able to consistently achieve “vital zone” hits on the targets out to 200 yards, and almost everyone could keep all their shots on the target (although not necessarily in the “vital zone”) when the range was increased to 300 yards. Personally, I was surprised at my ability to achieve this level of accuracy with a 2.5X long eye relief scope. Others were probably not so surprised at their shooting abilities. Students were all encouraged to shoot with both eyes open so they could take advantage of the low magnification and extended eye relief afforded by the Scout design.

    The most enjoyable part of the course for me (and I think for most are all of the other students) was shooting the “Scrambler”. We all shot it on Tuesday and again on Wednesday. It was on the Wednesday run on the “Scrambler” that I managed to outsmart myself when it came to tactics. I decided that since I was not going to set any speed records on the course that I would “shoot one, load one”, performing the load between shooting stations. I loaded up with six rounds and popped the magazine in the Scout down to the second detent to allow me to facilitate this strategy.

    I then proceeded to shoot the first target, run the bolt, forget to load one and dropped the firing pin on an empty chamber at the next shooting station. At which point I opened the bolt, single loaded a round, shot the second target, moved to the next shooting position while again running the bolt without single loading a round of ammunition so I was met with a second “click” at the next shooting station. This time I regained my composure, performed a “slap, rack, bang” malfunction drill and proceeded through the remainder of the drill with no further drama. Quite embarrassing, and a lesson I am certain I will not forget. Glad it happened on the “Scrambler” at Gunsite instead of during a situation in which something was shooting back at me or when a 180 class mule deer was providing me with an opportunity to shoot.

    To the best of my knowledge, here are the issues that were experienced with the rifles in this class:

    The shooter of the BLR had quite a bit of trouble achieving zero when we first got started, but eventually was able to get things lined out. I am not certain what the issue was, but it seemed to take a bit of time to get ironed out. I think this shooter also had a bit of minor problem with the trigger mechanism, but I am not certain. As a side note, this shooter was shooting 325 grain Hornady bullets in handloads. He used two different power levels of ammo. He said his light loads were getting 1900 FPS and his heavy loads were achieving 2100 FPS. He was an excellent shooter.

    The Savage Scout completely quit working just before lunch on the second day (would not fire). The shooter took it to the gunsmith during lunch where they found that the sear engagement was incorrect. Not certain of the details. He had no more problems with that rifle.

    One Steyr Scout experienced a separated case head on a round of reloaded ammunition brought by the shooter. No issue with the rifle, and the rifle was returned to service immediately after the piece of separated brass was removed from the chamber.

    The Ruger Scout had a loose scope mounting rail – found the mounting screws only finger tight. Obviously, the shooter had a lot of problem getting zero until this issue was identified and corrected. The Ruger shooter also (in my opinion) experienced a great bit of difficulty in achieving good sling position when assuming field shooting positions due to that huge extended Ruger magazine. It just seemed to be in the way during many of the exercises. The shooter indicated that he liked his Ruger Frontier without the detachable magazine better than he liked his Scout. As another personal observation, the Ruger Scout ejected brass farther than any other magazine fed bolt action rifle I have ever personally witnessed. And with authority. I am aware of this because there were several occasions when empty cases from this rifle bounced off my ear, head, and rifle, as I was shooting immediately to the right of the Ruger Scout shooter.

    One of the Steyr Scout rifles would not allow the operator to perform the “shoot one, load one” drill. The instructors attempted the same with this particular rifle, and the rifle simply would not allow one to drop a round in and close the bolt. The ammo was changed and different methodologies were applied for several minutes, but it simply would not feed a singly loaded round. The shooter took this rifle to the gunsmith during lunch break on the second day, and they were unable to correct this condition. When I inquired about what was discussed during the gunsmith visit, the shooter told me that the gunsmith had told him that it was simply a matter of the way the barrel was pressed into the action, and that “some work and some don’t” when attempting to load single rounds. I would imagine this could be corrected, but don’t know what the shooter’s plans are to address the issue.

    Three of the Steyr Scout rifles were the Cooper Commemorative models (I am not certain I have that terminology exactly correct). My Steyr was the only one of that brand that was not the Commemorative version. During a break, all four Steyr rifles happened to be placed alongside each other in the rack. It was noted that the barrels on the three Commemorative rifles were significantly heavier than the barrel on my Steyr. Mario Marchman had a Steyr Scout in .376 in his vehicle and brought it out. His rifle is a few years old and mine is four years old. The .376 Steyr had a light barrel profile similar to mine. The three Commemorative Steyr rifles had all been purchased in the past 6-8 months and had the identical, heavier profile. At the end of the class, we were able to visit Mrs. Cooper in her home, and during our tour of the armory, I noted one of the original Cooper Commemorative rifles. I checked the barrel profile on that rifle and it was the lightweight profile exactly the same as my rifle. This may be old news to many on the list, but I was previously unaware that there were differences in barrel weights/profiles among the Scout rifles.

    Following the awarding of our certificates on the third day of training, we (as previously mentioned) were all able to spend almost an hour visiting Mrs. Cooper in her home and enjoyed some of her homemade Texas brownies, coffee, tea, and lemonade. As always, she was the perfect and most gracious hostess. What a lovely lady.

    I can’t say enough about Il Ling and Mario. Terrific instructors, highly knowledgeable, very engaging, and fun to be around.

    During the classroom time at the end of the course, Il Ling asked the students for feedback regarding the class they had just completed. Almost everyone was in favor of expanding the class from a 3-day to a 5-day curriculum, and everyone had positive feedback. I personally added a comment that I wanted to share with Il Ling and Mario. I noted that during the entire three day class that Il Ling and Mario had consistently linked the Scout rifle education to Colonel Cooper. They had perpetuated his memory and contribution to rifle craft throughout their class, and I personally felt that was very, very important. I told them so and thanked them for that. They seemed to greatly appreciate the comment, and in fact Il Ling took me aside later while we were at Mrs. Cooper’s home and thanked me for the observation. She indicated that she planned to share the comment with Mrs. Cooper. Made my day.

    I learned a lot in three days and know that I hardly scratched the surface. I personally struggled with ammo management and magazine changes throughout the class as I tried to learn how to accomplish these tasks using my strong hand. This was a real challenge for me, since I am so used to doing these tasks with the support hand when shooting a pistol, shotgun, or AR. I fully understand the reasons for the difference when handling the Scout, but certainly never mastered ammo management during class. I did, however, perform some pretty spectacular “magazine juggling” feats throughout the three days! Practice, practice, practice! A gut feeling tells me that some of the other shooters struggled with learning to consistently leave their cheek welded to the stock as they worked the rifle bolt. I don’t recall being called on this, but I can certainly tell you I heard those remarks directed to many shooters throughout the three days of training.

    Finally, I had to bow to old age, limited neck movement and a bad shoulder when attempting to shoot from the prone position, I cannot shoot an AR, shotgun, or pistol very well from prone either due to these physical limitations, and although I tired, I simply could not tolerate shooting the Scout from prone position for more than a few minutes at a time. I did find that the integral bipod on the Scout helped me with this challenge, but it was not the solution I needed to be fully comfortable. As a result, I spent about half my time shooting from the seated position when other students (except for one, who had problems similar to mine) were in the prone position. I was able to shoot enough five shot groups at 200 and 300 yards to determine that I can personally shoot about 30% smaller groups from seated than I can from prone.

    All in all, I had a great time, learned a lot, and gained even more appreciation of the Scout rifle. I hope this class catches on and others get to experience this training.
    Thank you so much for posting that. Amazing AAR. Sounds like an awesome class for sure.

    I think it is cool that the Steyr scout has a mag detent position that allows you to have the mag loaded and yet allows ejection port single round chambering. I didn't know it had that feature. And very interesting that some allow it and some don't..I would guess, if the rifle has that detent feature most ought to be able to do it? I may ask for a snap cap and see if it will do it, if I go and buy one, or bring my own snap cap to try.
    But I could see how that could get you into trouble if you forget that it the mag is set in that detent position. Still it sounds like a useful feature.

  3. #73
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North AZ
    Quote Originally Posted by imp1295 View Post
    Yes, single top loading. My T3x cannot be loaded single into the magazine from open bolt.

    Featherweight compact is a 20" in bbl, 13" in LOP. Met my requirements because I don't mind a wood stock. VX-5HD 1-5, 13.7 oz.

    Attachment 42759
    Very nice set up, can't go wrong with that! Thanks for posting the picture.

    Will your Model 70 and Tikkas allow ejection port single round chambering?

  4. #74
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North AZ
    Quote Originally Posted by vaspence View Post
    Just pulled my T3x .308 out of safe and it lets me load a single round with the empty mag in.

    My T3 (not X) CTR .308 will also allow single loading on empty mag but not as reliably as the T3.

    ETA - Apologies did not realize you meant loading the magazine.
    I apologize, actually I wasn't clear enough. I did mean ejection port single round chambering, on an empty mag.

    On that note it sounds like Steyr Scouts, at least some (most?), will allow a loaded mag seated to a particular detent that still allows one to load and chamber via the ejection port.

    But it is good to know if a rifle allows one to load the mag via top loading, through the ejection port, as well.

    Come think of it, I would strongly consider getting a second, full on Scout style rifle, including with a forward mounted scope, if I could top load the magazine via stripper clips. Do any of the Scout rifles allow for that these days?
    Last edited by DacoRoman; 09-19-2019 at 09:57 PM.

  5. #75
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Back at Bragg
    Quote Originally Posted by DacoRoman View Post
    I apologize, actually I wasn't clear enough. I did mean ejection port single round chambering, on an empty mag.

    On that note it sounds like Steyr Scouts, at least some (most?), will allow a loaded mag seated to a particular detent that still allows one to load and chamber via the ejection port.

    But it is good to know if a rifle allows one to load the mag via top loading, through the ejection port, as well.

    Come think of it, I would strongly consider getting a second, full on Scout style rifle, including with a forward mounted scope, if I could top load the magazine via stripper clips. Do any of the Scout rifles allow for that these days?
    To be as clear as I can.

    Tikka T3x - Can single load round, push feed action. Cannot top off magazine from open bolt position. Must drop the magazine to load (cannot top off magazine from open bolt position.)

    Model 70 - Controlled Round Feed, like all the rest of the CRF. Cannot single load from open bolt. Must load into magazine.

    Hope that helps, others here can probably explain much more clearly than me. In fact, they have explained more clearly, it is just a matter of finding it.

  6. #76
    Site Supporter rob_s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SE FL
    Quote Originally Posted by DacoRoman View Post
    Hello y’all!

    I’m looking for a rifle like the title reads.

    I would like:
    - to put a 1-5 or 6x vs a 1-8x or possibly a 2.5-10 scope on it.
    - I would like to use 5-20 round mags, with extra points if it takes AR pattern mags
    - be able to use it as a personal defense weapon in states like CA, on overlanding trips
    - Use it for medium to large game out to 300 yards or so.
    - Be able to shoot reduced IPSC silhouette steel (12x24”) out to 500 yards

    The Ruger an Steyr Scouts are very intriguing but force you to mount a scope far forward, which I don’t want to do. And I would be willing to give up iron sights for a more traditional scope mounting system.

    There is the Mossberg MVP Scout, which has a longer rail that comes all the way back and takes AR10 mags but I’m concerned about quality and action.

    I like what’s going on here with this Tikka (video below), but the 10 round mags are $90 each, and I’d have to get some good gunsmith to cut down the barrel. But if pressed I'd go this type of route at this point.

    Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
    Going back to the OP...

    As someone that has spent countless hours on this thought experiment, and having read through the rest of the replies, my suggestion is this:

    Buy a gun and a scope and go shoot.

    That is, assuming that you have an actual need for the thing.

    Generally trying to reinvent the wheel in your own head is counter-productive, and you lack the experience and context to understand the nuances of what you’re trying to do or the consequences of some of the choices you’re making. The more esoteric these things get (sniper chassis, non-standard calibers, importing magazines from australia, etc.) the more you should start to realize that you’re balls-deep in the rabbit hole.

    Buy a Model 70 and a Ching Sling and go get yourself signed up for one of Randy Cain’s Practical Rifle classes.

    Or, if you really have a current need, buy pretty much any gun from pretty much any major manufacturer and put pretty much any optic in it and go see how it works for you, and adjust as necessary.

  7. #77
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North AZ
    Quote Originally Posted by imp1295 View Post
    To be as clear as I can.

    Tikka T3x - Can single load round, push feed action. Cannot top off magazine from open bolt position. Must drop the magazine to load (cannot top off magazine from open bolt position.)

    Model 70 - Controlled Round Feed, like all the rest of the CRF. Cannot single load from open bolt. Must load into magazine.

    Hope that helps, others here can probably explain much more clearly than me. In fact, they have explained more clearly, it is just a matter of finding it.
    Perfect thanks.

  8. #78
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North AZ

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    Going back to the OP...

    As someone that has spent countless hours on this thought experiment, and having read through the rest of the replies, my suggestion is this:

    Buy a gun and a scope and go shoot.

    That is, assuming that you have an actual need for the thing.

    Generally trying to reinvent the wheel in your own head is counter-productive, and you lack the experience and context to understand the nuances of what you’re trying to do or the consequences of some of the choices you’re making. The more esoteric these things get (sniper chassis, non-standard calibers, importing magazines from australia, etc.) the more you should start to realize that you’re balls-deep in the rabbit hole.

    Buy a Model 70 and a Ching Sling and go get yourself signed up for one of Randy Cain’s Practical Rifle classes.

    Or, if you really have a current need, buy pretty much any gun from pretty much any major manufacturer and put pretty much any optic in it and go see how it works for you, and adjust as necessary.
    I am very familiar with the spirit of your advice, and I’ve given it often myself. It is nice to use a forum like this as a sounding board, and learn a few things in the process. Besides everything discussed so far has revolved around good practical choices, without any strange rodent holes. It has been a good review I think, with some very specific and useful information. Much better than get any scope and any rifle, although like I said, I totally get what you are getting at.

  9. #79
    The reason why I still prefer the .308 for me, and this is based on the style of hunting that I do/animals I shoot/where I live (Northern Rockies), is that when properly utilizing the T3 platform to its full potential (remember it is a long action), I can easily swap out my standard 155 Scenars for something a lot heavier if I need to:




    Shown in this pic are Left to Right:

    155 grain Lapua Scenar, 200 grain Nosler Partition, and 215 grain Berger VLD.





    The 155 Scenar and 200 grain Partition both work fine using the standard medium (.308) magazines. The 215 Bergers require that I use a large mag that comes standard with the 30-06/.300WM.

    Shown here is a 200 Grain Partition loaded to max length to take advantage of the ID of the mag.



    215 Berger/large mag:





    Generally I have one of these mags (full of 200 grain Nosler Partitions*) with me in case we run into a large bear (Ursus HolyShitus)while on a kill site or whatever. I have yet to see a critter however that could stand up to the 155 Scenars though. While I have yet to personally ever see any animal walk away from a hit from a 155 Scenar fired from a .308 or 30-06, and I did note some pics floating around the net of what is some version of brown bear/Griz that got DRT'd by a couple of 155 Scenars from a .308, if given the choice of a magazine full of 200 grain Partitions or 155 Scenars, I would skip the match bullet and go with the purpose built projectile, not to mention go with the heavier one (which is pretty much always a good idea when dealing with large/dangerous critters as a general rule). It is just one of those "have it and not need it" tools, much like a take down cleaning rod, and a broken shell extractor.

    * The 215 Bergers were a long range experiment. They worked fine but I ended up standardizing on the 155 Scenar as my all around load, as I tend to pick one or two loads for a cartridge, and load in bulk.

    Elk, bear, moose, are all reasons I would rather have a .30 cal instead of a 6.5.

    There are no flies at all on the 6.5 Creedmoor and there will be one in the safe as soon as I burn out the barrel on my old R700 .260 heavy barrel , or do some more horse trading and decide to grab another T3.

    The 6.5 CM does a lot of things well, and at extended ranges, it really shines, but when a person is an experienced handloader and can pick an appropriate projectile (with ballistic coefficients that are similar) the performance gap between the two is pretty thin.

    Given that, I would pretty much always rather hit an elk with a 200 grain bullet than a 130 grain, at the cost of a little bit more recoil (mitigated by muzzle brakes).

    Now with that said, if mule deer, elk, bears etc are not on the menu and punching AR-500 plates is something that is more likely than punching elk front shoulders then the 6.5 CM makes sense. Choose the right tool for the job you are most likely to do, not the one you might do "some day" (but in reality probably won't).

  10. #80
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    North AZ
    Quote Originally Posted by Lost River View Post
    The reason why I still prefer the .308 for me, and this is based on the style of hunting that I do/animals I shoot/where I live (Northern Rockies), is that when properly utilizing the T3 platform to its full potential (remember it is a long action), I can easily swap out my standard 155 Scenars for something a lot heavier if I need to:




    Shown in this pic are Left to Right:

    155 grain Lapua Scenar, 200 grain Nosler Partition, and 215 grain Berger VLD.





    The 155 Scenar and 200 grain Partition both work fine using the standard medium (.308) magazines. The 215 Bergers require that I use a large mag that comes standard with the 30-06/.300WM.

    Shown here is a 200 Grain Partition loaded to max length to take advantage of the ID of the mag.



    215 Berger/large mag:





    Generally I have one of these mags (full of 200 grain Nosler Partitions*) with me in case we run into a large bear (Ursus HolyShitus)while on a kill site or whatever. I have yet to see a critter however that could stand up to the 155 Scenars though. While I have yet to personally ever see any animal walk away from a hit from a 155 Scenar fired from a .308 or 30-06, and I did note some pics floating around the net of what is some version of brown bear/Griz that got DRT'd by a couple of 155 Scenars from a .308, if given the choice of a magazine full of 200 grain Partitions or 155 Scenars, I would skip the match bullet and go with the purpose built projectile, not to mention go with the heavier one (which is pretty much always a good idea when dealing with large/dangerous critters as a general rule). It is just one of those "have it and not need it" tools, much like a take down cleaning rod, and a broken shell extractor.

    * The 215 Bergers were a long range experiment. They worked fine but I ended up standardizing on the 155 Scenar as my all around load, as I tend to pick one or two loads for a cartridge, and load in bulk.

    Elk, bear, moose, are all reasons I would rather have a .30 cal instead of a 6.5.

    There are no flies at all on the 6.5 Creedmoor and there will be one in the safe as soon as I burn out the barrel on my old R700 .260 heavy barrel , or do some more horse trading and decide to grab another T3.

    The 6.5 CM does a lot of things well, and at extended ranges, it really shines, but when a person is an experienced handloader and can pick an appropriate projectile (with ballistic coefficients that are similar) the performance gap between the two is pretty thin.

    Given that, I would pretty much always rather hit an elk with a 200 grain bullet than a 130 grain, at the cost of a little bit more recoil (mitigated by muzzle brakes).

    Now with that said, if mule deer, elk, bears etc are not on the menu and punching AR-500 plates is something that is more likely than punching elk front shoulders then the 6.5 CM makes sense. Choose the right tool for the job you are most likely to do, not the one you might do "some day" (but in reality probably won't).
    Many thanks for the great info. I’ll be studying it for a bit.

    Btw all, I’m about half way through that Scout 2016 thread. Epic thread for sure. If anyone is researching practical rifle type platforms that thread is a must read for sure.

    Thanks again to all.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •