Sig P365 SAS

[Trooper224]

I've carried guns for over three decades, in all manner of clothing and weather and I've never-ever had a sight snag on a garment. Hammers yes, but not sights. I really don't see the concern that makes something as extremely outside the box as this necessary.

[BillSWPA]

A big part of avoiding snagging is using good holsters. Before I knew better, I snagged a slide release of a Glock on the retention strap of a cheap nylon holster.

The hammer spur on a Colt Detective Special is a virtual fish hook. A cheap nylon retention strap can get folded up under the hammer spur in a way that causes the snap to catch when it hits the hammer. Again, good holster selection solves the problem.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LOKNLOD]

With no front sight, I wonder if this will be new @GJM 's new bear-hunting gun.

[YVK]

I have been away from this thread all day, away at a match. You guys are easily entertained.

I'll be more entertained if you bought a 365XL SAS, which I am sure is coming soon.

[GJM]

I'll be more entertained if you bought a 365XL SAS, which I am sure is coming soon.

Dude, the target market for the 365 SAS and, I assume the forthcoming XL, is physicians.

[Clusterfrack]

Dude, the target market for the 365 SAS and, I assume the forthcoming XL, is physicians.

Maybe, but I think the target market is keister carry.

[BK14]

I’ve seen that technique before and it works for me sometimes. I feel like clothing plays a larger variable than he appears to. As an example the basketball shorts I’m currently wearing are very smooth - almost a shiny nylon. I’d hate to have to use that technique right now. And what if the person forced to use one handed techniques has a leg injury or pants covered in blood, or some oily substance? What if the shooter is in an unorthodox position behind cover or seated in their vehicle?

I want my technique and my gear to afford me the maximum ability to keep fighting. I train and compete a lot. I buy ammo by the case and pay out of pocket for classes with exceptional instructors. I still don’t find Bill’s technique to be the best answer for me. As an agency firearms instructor I have to teach people way less interested in training and shooting than I am. They don’t spend enough time on two handed shooting, much less one handed or injured shooter drills. Having a rear sight with a shelf is to me essential equipment. That’s doesn’t mean anyone else has to agree with me, but at the same time nobody will convince me Bill’s technique is a first choice for anyone unless they are on a full time tactical team or SOF. Even then I think those folks would be better served with a rear sight that allows racking.

With regard to the 365 SAS I don’t see any advantage there that makes giving up the ability to easily rack a slide using the sights even worth considering. YMMV.

Again, I think this whole concept of removing sights is stupid. Every pistol I own has a ledged rear sight, and a requirement before I’d carry a gun on or off duty is that I’d have a ledged rear sight or RMR. Just sharing info that there’s other options out there besides a giant ledge that can be implemented since some out there would insinuagr that the lack of a ledge equaled sure death.

[Greg]

See, Robar could still be in business if they'd shown themselves to have THE Kiester Carry finish.

Better than Nitron..
Better than Tenifer...
Better than DLC....

FECALGUARD NP3

[Clusterfrack]

Brian Enos can market a new lube: Anus Slide Glide.

[YVK]

Dude, the target market for the 365 SAS and, I assume the forthcoming XL, is physicians.

Cause we're so awesome, we don't need no fucking sights to hit stuff.
Or we so fucking blind after eight years of post-doc training, no sights can help us.


I and Mrs. just finished a bottle of '14 Pinot so if you trolled me hard enough, I just might remove the front sight on my G48 and paint a small dot right in the middle of the rear.