One thing to keep in mind here is that there are two ways we should view this. One way is we know the outcome and in hindsight what could have been done differently. The other is based off what we see, was the force reasonable based off of what we presume the officer knew at that moment.
In hindsight it’s very easy to say that the suspect should have been handled fairly early in that encounter and justify it based off the fact that after he was taken into custody he was determined to be the murder suspect. In BFE Virginia, if you think some meth’d out white boy can’t randomly pop out of the woods, run into the middle of a major police incident looking for help because he’s getting chased by “them”, I think you’re making some poor assumptions about what could go wrong this world.
There’s plenty to criticize regardless of how you look at this. The use of force standard is was this use of force reasonable based off of what was or was not reasonably known to the actor at the time or are we applying 20/20 hindsight.
I don’t know if there an applicable felony statute for choking, otherwise those officer were not in a clear cut fleeing felon situation.