Was thinking the same things. However, I've been known to mess up the simplest of installations. lol I also like to support LTT for all the great stuff they have done lately for Beretta. Langdon also mentioned something about ATF compliance? Not sure what that is about. You will have to forgive my ignorance. Would adding these parts on yourself cause a potential issue with that as it is an imported shotgun?
Are the Magpul stocks a big improvement? You get Mlok but what else?
-Seconds Count. Misses Don't-
I was really hoping that he had persuaded beretta to make the factory forearm reinforced to run picatinny rails at 3, 6 and 9:00. I really like how light my 1301 feels
It has to be 922r compliant. Basically, rifles and shotguns being imported aren't allowed to have certain features when coming into the US even though those features are perfectly legal. (ammo capacity, pistol grips, "assault weapon" type features) Once they're in the US, if you want to add those features, there is a list of specific parts and the gun can't have more than 10 foreign made parts off that list. So you end up replacing things that don't need replacing just so the gun can be considered US made in some roundabout convoluted way just so you can legally have a shotgun that holds more than 5 rounds or a rifle with a pistol grip. It's why Saiga and Vepr rifles were the way they were. It's really really stupid and a pain in the ass.
Since we're now discussing it, I'd be very interested in LTT coming in here and explaining what they are doing that makes the LTT 1301 922(r) compliant with the mag tube extension. I've studied that with respect to the 1301. By my count, the buttstock, handguard and mag follower only get the count down to 11 parts.
https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....490#post709490
.
-----------------------------------------
Not another dime.