Are the Brownells kits cheaper than what was available in the past?
Are the Brownells kits cheaper than what was available in the past?
#RESIST
*Not gonna go read the comment section*
*Not gonna go read the comment section*
*Not gonna go read the comment section*
Ah hell, BRB gonna go read the comment section.
Last edited by Casual Friday; 08-11-2019 at 07:03 PM.
Kind of surprised me but -
1) Any type of failure test of this type is a "sample of one" and subject to randomness.
2) It could be that the gas venting from the BCG of a DI AR has some clearing advantage for this type of failure mode, then again it could just be dumb luck that the right amount of goop fell into the chamber at the right time here.
3) While I very much like 1/2 of the InRange team - I also have to think that the folks involved with the various LS/HD units (and even the French Army) have conducted their own testing. I trust the guys in SFOD-D a little more than Karl.
4) Even though piston guns like the 416 may be more vulnerable to stoppages caused by debris entering from the dust cover, they are less susceptible to stoppages caused by other factors. No design is perfect as the InRange duo has shown.
Meh DILGAF. Moar backyard testing, LL are you trolling for HK snobs? You should've posted the P30 having an epic failure. It would've been more entertaining.
Honestly not surprised. Was not super impressed by the IAR (longer barreled 416 action) and didn't find it gave us a huge advantage over the AR platform. People keep chasing ways to improve a platform that works really well when maintained and treated semi decently.
Per the PF Code of Conduct, I have a commercial interest in the StreakTM product as sold by Ammo, Inc.
Dude could use some help understanding what type of malfunction he is having.
"Gunfighting is a thinking man's game. So we might want to bring thinking back into it."-MDFA
Beware of my temper, and the dog that I've found...