The 43X/48 and 365/365XL are EDC game changers

[CarloMNL]

I haven't shot a 365 yet, but the stock safety lever appears a little too slim and dinky to ride thumb-on-top through recoil.

I've shot both a 365 and an XL that had the manual safety. The width of the levers is workable for me but the placement that I have more difficulty with. If the shelf of the lever was moved just a little forward, that would be great (for my hand size and shape, at least.)

I suppose this is well within SIG's manufacturing capability. I'm not sure though if there is enough demand (for manual safety versions) right now to entice SIG or an aftermarket parts maker to invest in production.

[Hot Sauce]

I've shot both a 365 and an XL that had the manual safety. The width of the levers is workable for me but the placement that I have more difficulty with. If the shelf of the lever was moved just a little forward, that would be great (for my hand size and shape, at least.)

I suppose this is well within SIG's manufacturing capability. I'm not sure though if there is enough demand (for manual safety versions) right now to entice SIG or an aftermarket parts maker to invest in production.

This is why I expected an aftermarket answer to be more likely, because my thought is that SIG is unlikely to make a change like that without a requirement from a large org customer.

By and large, the market eschews manual safeties outside of legacy platforms and military spec'd contracts.