LTT Beretta 92 Optimized Performance Trigger Bar

[PGT]

I had the exact same issue with my TJIAB on an LTT frame. I had a second LTT frame to swap between and it worked fine in that. So, what you're seeing is tolerance stacking and how a generic trigger job can't be 100% perfect. With some feedback from LTT over email, I watched Ernie's video about how to stone the top of the hammer bar and mine's perfect now.

[Coyote41]

Is the LTT trigger made from a factory trigger bar? If so does that make it USPSA production legal?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sal Picante]

Is the LTT trigger made from a factory trigger bar? If so does that make it USPSA production legal?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is a big question... There precedent in USPSA is that if the external portion of a "trigger" component matches the outward appearance of the OEM unit, it is generally ok. I think an LTT enhanced trigger bar would be ok for production. (In IPSC, it would be a no-go).

For more reading (I'm sorry to send you here, but it illustrates the confusing mess that production is in now...)
http://www.doodieproject.com/index.p...-the-rulebook/

[Sensei]

I had the exact same issue with my TJIAB on an LTT frame. I had a second LTT frame to swap between and it worked fine in that. So, what you're seeing is tolerance stacking and how a generic trigger job can't be 100% perfect. With some feedback from LTT over email, I watched Ernie's video about how to stone the top of the hammer bar and mine's perfect now.

I had a few extra minutes today and took the 92A1 with a TJIAB + Optimized Performance Trigger Bar to the range. It cycled 50 rounds oh Blazer Brass without issue. Reset is slightly longer than, but comparable to a SRT-equipped Sig.

[Coyote41]

This is a big question... There precedent in USPSA is that if the external portion of a "trigger" component matches the outward appearance of the OEM unit, it is generally ok. I think an LTT enhanced trigger bar would be ok for production. (In IPSC, it would be a no-go).

For more reading (I'm sorry to send you here, but it illustrates the confusing mess that production is in now...)
http://www.doodieproject.com/index.p...-the-rulebook/

Yeah. That doodie thread...I think I’m even more confused.

[wtturn]

This is a big question... There precedent in USPSA is that if the external portion of a "trigger" component matches the outward appearance of the OEM unit, it is generally ok. I think an LTT enhanced trigger bar would be ok for production. (In IPSC, it would be a no-go).

For more reading (I'm sorry to send you here, but it illustrates the confusing mess that production is in now...)
http://www.doodieproject.com/index.p...-the-rulebook/

All that went out the window with the 2019 rulebook revision.

All aftermarket triggers and trigger components are legal in production now.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk

[Coyote41]

All that went out the window with the 2019 rulebook revision.

All aftermarket triggers and trigger components are legal in production now.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk

I did not see trigger bar listed, however.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wtturn]

I did not see trigger bar listed, however.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think a fair argument puts trigger bars under "triggers" for the purposes of that rule.

If you're worried about it, send a quick email to DNROI to verify.



Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk

[Coyote41]

Not much point to it right now. The 92X I planned on putting it on is still not on the production list. Also, I can’t even find a holster for it yet. JMCK is working on getting one available.

[e_stern]

Not much point to it right now. The 92X I planned on putting it on is still not on the production list. Also, I can’t even find a holster for it yet. JMCK is working on getting one available.

Standard (non Performance) 92X Pistols fit in M9A3 holsters.