Anyone remember Jim Bakker. Cast from the same mold.
In the P-F basket of deplorables.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...-run-it-395005
I like these ideas.
Getting rid of WLP and reducing the size of the board are clearly necessary. While specifically picking a Democrat might not be the best route. the NRA should recognize that it has historically been a single issue organization and needs to return to that model. Those who support other causes can also join other organizations that support those causes.
The board should be composed of people who are there because they have experience running organizations, and not people who are there simply because they are big names in the shooting community.
I suspect you may be correct, tat and all.
Uhmm....No. Just no. It would signal a willingness to compromise more of our rights away. I don't think that a democrat would be in the same boat as I, in that I am in no way supportive of a single damn thing more as to "reasonable" gun control of any kind no matter how "reasonable" sounding it may be. I don't think a democrat's heart would be in true and actual compromise. Ditching the NFA anyone? How about no more 4473s? True compromise means getting something in return and the democrats don't see it that way unless they are the ones getting. If you did find one, the optics would still be wrong. It would be chumming the waters so to speak.
Absofreakingloutely! And don't forget to pair down by a minimum of two thirds. Personally I'd like to see it at 10-11'ish.