View Poll Results: Self-Illuminating Night Sights - Yay - Nay?

Voters
96. You may not vote on this poll
  • Night sights on all carry guns

    41 42.71%
  • Night sights on some carry guns

    39 40.63%
  • No night sights on any carry gun

    12 12.50%
  • Mods Here Are Shit

    4 4.17%
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 56

Thread: Self-Illuminating Night Sight Poll

  1. #31
    Quite the trip down memory lane...
    King-Tappan painted sights on a Colt .45acp, followed by early Trijicon night sights on a duty S&W 4506 in the late 80s.
    The majority of GLOCKs have some form of night sight: GLOCK 3 dot night sights years ago, up to the GLOCK BOLD sights which I like very much. Currently an Aimpoint ACRO backed up by Heinie suppressor sights. Warren/Sevigny 2 dot night sights, and “Big Dot” night sight on a snub. I am sentimental about two sets of gold bead sights(front) on a couple of GLOCKs. Quite honestly, the night sight helps me find the weapon in the dark. I really do prefer some sort of highlighting on the front sight, if not using a “red dot”. My personal dream in an “iron sight” would be a gold bead front with tritium tube, and a single tube in rear sight(yellow). No one has said they will build that. I continue to be optimistic about red dots-Aimpoint and Trijicon.
    Short answer after all that: some form of tritium if at all possible on one piece of the sights for me, please.

  2. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by UNM1136 View Post
    With night sights I am almost off of the need for more than a front dot. I blacken the rear dots, anyway, so why spend the money?

    pat

    Define blacken the rear? I prefer the vials in the rear to be surrounded by the black sleeves, but on factory pistols, not always an option.

  3. #33
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    ABQ
    Quote Originally Posted by beenalongtime View Post
    Define blacken the rear? I prefer the vials in the rear to be surrounded by the black sleeves, but on factory pistols, not always an option.
    Wish I could take credit for it...take a Sharpie (I have always had black on hand, Chuck Haggard has in the past recommended red) and color in the dots on the rear sight. On non tritium sights, like my M&P9c you can get almost a completely black rear sight, while on tritium sights it dims the rear sight lamps just enough that the front sight really stands out. You still have some glow to apply the three dot principle, but your eye is drawn to the brighter, greener, clearer front sight lamp. I find I need to reapply ever year or so.I use this on my issue M&P9, so the gun isn't modded at all. This is the only thing that keeps me from jumping to front sight only...

    pat

  4. #34
    Member That Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    overseas
    Quote Originally Posted by revchuck38 View Post
    My understanding is that the PPQ and P99 front sights are interchangeable.
    That is correct.

    I have done a fair bit of shooting outdoors in diminishing light. My observations on what works for me:

    Orange paint or sight inserts completely disappear from view somewhere around dusk. I have yet to discover which color would be optimal for me.

    Not all fiber optic sights are equal. The snap on fiber optic beads Hi-Viz makes for shotguns are surprisingly visible in surprisingly low light.

    I lose the ability to see a sight picture much sooner than my ability to see and identify people, see what is in their hands or what they are doing. And of course, seeing where a static cardboard target is, is much simpler than that. Indoors, I remember dry firing in our apartment in the city during daylight hours with the curtains closed and all the lights in the room on. I picked up the tritium dot much quicker during the presentation of the pistol than the rest of the sight, even though the room was fully lit.

    So in my opinion, tritium dots on front and rear sights are very useful for the limited time window between day light and night. Tritium front only is not nearly as useful for me, as while I know where the front sight is, I have no idea of its orientation to the rear sight.

    Once it gets dark enough one needs a white light to see or identify targets, then this stuff of course no longer matters as you are aligning the silhouettes of the sights against the target.

  5. #35
    Site Supporter JohnO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    CT (behind Enemy lines)
    Night sights for years were thought to be requirement on a carry gun. However no one really gave consideration to where self luminous sights are actually employable. To say in low light or no light conditions doesn't offer the proper context. Conditions must be too dark to see your sights yet you are still able to positively identify your target. A sliver between where you don't and do need a flashlight for PID.

  6. #36
    Site Supporter CCT125US's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    It would be an interesting experiment to have folks post a defining pic of low light. I have observed quite a variation in how people define it.

    Sorry for the thread drift.
    Taking a break from social media.

  7. #37
    banana republican blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mtns
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnO View Post
    Night sights for years were thought to be requirement on a carry gun. However no one really gave consideration to where self luminous sights are actually employable. To say in low light or no light conditions doesn't offer the proper context. Conditions must be too dark to see your sights yet you are still able to positively identify your target. A sliver between where you don't and do need a flashlight for PID.
    Exactly so. Probably a very rare occurence, especially for those outside LE or the military...but it made a significant difference in my own training and qualification scenarios in terms of the confidence that sights were properly aligned in very low light scenarios with faintly visible targets. In fact, that's what prompted me to consider adding them after so many years without.
    There's nothing civil about this war.

  8. #38
    Member That Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    overseas
    Quote Originally Posted by CCT125US View Post
    It would be an interesting experiment to have folks post a defining pic of low light. I have observed quite a variation in how people define it.
    Unfortunately there would be some technical challenges to overcome, since cameras don't see things the same way human eyes do.

  9. #39
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW
    Quote Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
    Unfortunately there would be some technical challenges to overcome, since cameras don't see things the same way human eyes do.
    To say nothing of low light also being relative (to the eye’s current state of adaptation) and not absolute.
    ”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB

  10. #40
    Modding this sack of shit BehindBlueI's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Midwest
    Quote Originally Posted by Sidheshooter View Post
    To say nothing of low light also being relative (to the eye’s current state of adaptation) and not absolute.
    That's no shit. My "low light" today isn't my 20 year old eyes "low light".
    Sorta around sometimes for some of your shitty mod needs.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •