Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: 1911 Grip Safety Improvement

  1. #11
    Member cclaxton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Vienna, Va
    I evaluated all three guns.
    The Springfield 1911-A1 45 Stainless has the longest depression needed, maybe more than half way needed.
    The Springfield 1911-A1 9mm and Remington R1 have about the same and maybe 40% needed to release.
    Also, there seems to be a higher tension on the 45 A1.
    And, as mentioned, when I put my thumb on the safety, it creates a little pocket, but not so much that it turns on the safety.
    BTW I never have this problem with my XDm.

    I am going to take them out to the range and give them another run and see if I can figure out if this is grip/training or one of the guns has more of an issue for my hands.

    Thanks for all the great posts.
    Cody
    That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state;

  2. #12
    Hobbyist JAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kansas City
    If your hands are small like mine you may find that thin stocks help; I do. I also shoot better with them. I can run a gun with thick stocks but I prefer thin.

  3. #13
    Hammertime
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Desert Southwest
    The grip safety is the main reason I gave up on the 1911. That and I didnít shoot it better than various plastic guns

  4. #14
    Have a gunsmith, knowledgeable about the 1911 platform, take a look at the pistol(s) and sensitize the grip safety to suit. Almost everything about a 1911 is customizable and tunable by a good gunsmith. If youíre a DYI kind of person, YouTube has a number of relevant videos.
    Bob
    9MM: 92 Elite LTT, CenTac
    .45 ACP: Wilson Combat, Nighthawk, Dan Wesson, Springfield, Colt
    Confederate Civil War reproductions: 1863 Richmond rifle, Spiller and Burr revolver

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc_Glock View Post
    The grip safety is the main reason I gave up on the 1911.
    One thing I DON'T like about my Wilson EDC X9 is they eliminated the grip safety. For a SA pistol carried AIWB, I'd rather keep the grip safety

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    In exile
    I took my Colt with it's GI type grip safety to a gunsmith and asked him to tune it to off safe 50% of the way in. This plus an arched MSH did the trick. I had a lot of trouble with the high ride beavertail type safeties until I got the plain jane Colt.

  7. #17
    Here is an idea:
    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....Series-70-Colt

    The owner grips very high and has trouble with the grip safety.
    So I set it for minimal, but positive, engagement and increased the protrusion of the 'hump'
    by .084".











    Chuck Rogers
    www.RogersPrecision.com
    Cheap-Fast-Good............pick any two.

  8. #18
    Site Supporter entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Midwest. Far Upper Midwest whever I get the chance
    Timely thread.

    I took my SA Champion out for some drills the other day. Aging and thinning hands, plus years away from the design concentrating on HKs and revolvers have taken its toll. Long trigger, high safety, and a flat housing are now causing me some issues. Itís very minimal. Mostly itís causing a rough pull as the grip safety is not quite disengaged. Its about 30-40% of the time.

    Another item to note when I order my semi custom.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •