Page 16 of 19 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 184

Thread: Glock 45 (gen 5 obviously) trigger gone to complete shit at 1,500 rounds

  1. #151
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    I asked this some pages back, and don’t believe anyone responded, but is there any data, beyond anecdotal, that the M Glock pistols perform better than regular Gen 5 equivalents? Does anyone know if the M pistols produced in the future will continue to have that special internal coating?
    Not that is public. But, hypothetically if a large agency that issues M models tested Gen 5 G26s because there is no 26M, they might find the M models triggers broke in and stayed nice while some 26.5 triggers degraded but the guns still worked.

    My understanding is the coating on M internals is simply DLC. Several other federal agencies are buying Glock 17/19 Ms off the FBI contract including the DEA, US Marshals, State Dept DSS, and, I believe BATFE so there is a fair demand for them.

  2. #152
    Didn’t CBP just adopt Glock Gen 5 26, 19mos and 47mos Guns? I am sure they did a bit of testing. Unless their Gen. 5 guns are getting some special internal coatings I am guessing they are no different than what is currently offered. I could be wrong though.

  3. #153
    Quote Originally Posted by CDFIII View Post
    Didn’t CBP just adopt Glock Gen 5 26, 19mos and 47mos Guns? I am sure they did a bit of testing. Unless their Gen. 5 guns are getting some special internal coatings I am guessing they are no different than what is currently offered. I could be wrong though.
    The CBP guns are not standard Gen5 26’s, not sure about the 19’s.

  4. #154
    Quote Originally Posted by TC215 View Post
    The CBP guns are not standard Gen5 26’s, not sure about the 19’s.
    Now I’m curious.. what’s the differences do you have any insight? Thanks

  5. #155
    Quote Originally Posted by CDFIII View Post
    Now I’m curious.. what’s the differences do you have any insight? Thanks
    The G26 (G26 Mod 1) has FCS and a slightly longer grip with flared magwell, and has an 11 round magazine. They’re also calling the G19 a Mod 1, but I don’t know what changes it has.


  6. #156
    Member StraitR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Basking in sunshine
    I really hope they bring that 47 to the commercial market. I'd love to piece together a factory 17k. We can only speculate at this point, but I can't see Glock leaving good money on the table. If anything, they'll release it in Bad Boys 2 color format first, sell a pile, then six months later give us the all black model and half the people who bought silver will buy a second one in black. Doubling down on one customer seems to be their marketing strategy as of late.
    Last edited by StraitR; 05-26-2019 at 10:30 PM.

  7. #157
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrin View Post
    By the time you DLC coat the components necessary - you’re then North of the cost of a VP9 LE w/ NS & 3 mags. A gun that works.

    I get the love for Glocks, but at some point (like I reached), it’s enough.
    Um, I’m seeing quotes of about $30 to DLC the trigger bar and connector. How do you figure?
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  8. #158
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Most mention of flaking/ bad trigger pulls I see are in relation to the end of the trigger bar where it interfaces with the connector.

    Has snyone else had the fin that engages the firing pin safety plunger or the plunger itself flake or get chewed up?

    I noticed the trigger pull on my 17.4 MOS has been degrading and noticed this damage on the plunger:


    Name:  9E7AD099-D1A0-4F89-ACDA-89172807F044.jpg
Views: 680
Size:  71.5 KB

    Name:  229C94BF-158A-41C0-BEFF-12EB24643379.jpg
Views: 560
Size:  40.4 KB

    Name:  9419EFA4-C200-4078-B80C-7651E510484D.jpg
Views: 574
Size:  91.3 KB
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by HCM; 05-27-2019 at 01:13 AM.

  9. #159
    Member ASH556's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Braselton, GA
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Most mention of flaking/ bad trigger pulls I see are in relation to the end of the trigger bar where it interfaces with the connector.

    Has snyone else had the fin that engages the firing pin safety plunger or the plunger itself flake or get chewed up?

    I noticed the trigger pull on my 17.4 MOS has been degrading and noticed this damage on the plunger:


    Name:  9E7AD099-D1A0-4F89-ACDA-89172807F044.jpg
Views: 680
Size:  71.5 KB

    Name:  229C94BF-158A-41C0-BEFF-12EB24643379.jpg
Views: 560
Size:  40.4 KB

    Name:  9419EFA4-C200-4078-B80C-7651E510484D.jpg
Views: 574
Size:  91.3 KB
    Looks a lot like my Gen 4 17 I posted earlier in this thread.
    Food Court Apprentice
    Semper Paratus certified AR15 armorer

  10. #160
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrin View Post
    GJM - I did offer a solution. VP9.

    Between user reports and Glock's response, well, there it is - I held out for 14 pages.

    Back to my reading.
    There’s no Gadget available for the VP9.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •