I'm still not really concerned about the "Duty Grade" rating based on the drop and crush test results at all.
For me, for a LE "Duty grade" Pistol Mounted Optic I am far more interested in having a top loading battery compartment. This will mitigate most of the mounting related issues which has been the biggest issue (by far) I've seen with LE Pistol Mounted Optic systems. Especially now that more and larger LE agencies are adopting PMO's, the mounting of the PMO's on factory adapter plate systems like the MOS, CORE, etc. will likely become the biggest issue regarding "reliability" of the overall PMO systems for LE duty/service pistols.
I'm also far more interested in having a bigger and clearer window display to see and gather more information through, than I am concerned about the drop or crush testing results. The window of the SRO is soo much better than the RMR's window that I'm willing to make the sacrifice in "durability" regarding the drop test results.
And I'm also more interested in having an extended battery life, than I am the drop or crush test results.
Last edited by NickDrak; 06-19-2019 at 11:51 AM.
No joy in Mudville. Zeroed my SRO, made witness marks. Good news is the adjustments are holding steady. The bad news is, in manual mode, the dot is morphing in intensity between 2.5 and 10 MOA.
Out of the box failure!
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
I have been told that there is an RMR type 3 coming that will incorporate some of the SRO's improvements, but that the earliest you'll see it is SHOT 2020. I was not told what improvements they might choose, but one would hope that they keep the controls of the SRO at the very least, allowing locking out of the battery save functionality, and hopefully somehow redesign to allow for a top loaded battery.
All the new optics seem to be shitting the bed. Disappointing.
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
Camaraderie: your competitors release shitty products, and you do the same. United, we fall.
Doesn't read posts longer than two paragraphs.