Cut from a recent thread on a similar topic. I would not let polarized drive the train for eyepro. If the eyepro in question is not on the list referenced below, I would be suspect. It seems like most of the referenced sets have a clear and grey lenses that are not polarized. FWIW.
"Re Eyepro: You have one set of eyes. NEVER Scrimp on eyepro. I will go one step farther: NEVER scrimp on anything that comes between you and the ground:
ergo, shoes, socks, brakes, tires and mattresses as well... but I digress.
Let me tell you a story:
Circa 2005. Gunsite 250 in a contracted class with 19 of my closest shooting chums. Day 2 of a 5 days class in the am I have a 5.3g of 231 over a 230 RNL self reloaded .45 ACP round turn out to be a double charge in a stock Kimber "Series I" 5 inch, all steel gun. The recoil impulse and noise were such that both I and the RO on my side of the line knew something was up. I stayed aimed in downrange. The RO repeatedly said "Counselor give me the gun and come off the line." I did and he looked at me after removing my Oakley M Series specs.
I had some "powder splatter" on my unprotected check that bled a bit. My "VR28" lenses had some impact spots that were more than scratches but less than pock marks. Another RO who was also a gunsmith cleared my gun for service and I got back on the line with another set of M-Frames after missing a few relays.
Pat Rogers (RIP) talked me into those glasses on another forum way back in the day. Perhaps some of the best money I have ever spent.
I have since learned that the the M Series of old does not meet the latest spec. I then consulted the previously referenced armed forces approved list: \
https://www.peosoldier.army.mil/equipment/eyewear/#
... and have been sporting ESS stuff ever since. I simply would not wear eyopro while shooting that was not on that list or made to that spec as per an eye professional I trusted.
YMMV Greatly."