Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Here’s a random one for the collective: tents as legal domicile?

  1. #1
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW

    Here’s a random one for the collective: tents as legal domicile?

    As briefly as possible: my understanding is that hotel rooms are legally your temporary domicile, for the purposes of unlimbering your 870 or state-legal handgun for nightstand duty. So is a parked motorhome.

    Anyone here have any idea what the situation is for tents? In particular, tents in state park campgrounds, or KOAs and the like.

    Thanks in advance for any input.
    Last edited by Totem Polar; 02-17-2019 at 04:06 PM.
    ”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB

  2. #2
    Chasing the Horizon RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Central FL
    That is a pretty interesting question.

    In general, after three years of RV travel, my abiding sense of "most" state laws is that your RV is a vehicle when rolling, however when "encamped" or at least stopped for the night (certainly if detached from my truck) it became my domicile for legal purposes.

    A tent, though, I am not quite sure.

  3. #3
    Site Supporter 41magfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    NC
    I would think the legal presumptions afforded by Castle Doctrine type statues would still apply in most states that have those laws on the books, but you'd need to check. In my state, a temporary shelter like a tent is covered under our CD statue.

    ETA: I would think it goes without saying that you can defend yourself anywhere. But, the devil is in the details and CD laws attach legal presumptions that may or may not be relevant in all acts of self-defense.
    Last edited by 41magfan; 02-17-2019 at 04:42 PM.
    The path of least resistance will seldom get you where you need to be.

  4. #4
    Site Supporter JohnO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    CT (behind Enemy lines)
    I have often heard that you can have multiple residences but only one domicile.


    Blacks Law Dictionary
    DOMICILE. That place where a man has his
    true, fixed, and permanent home and principal
    establishment, and to which whenever he is absent
    he has the intention of returning. Kurilla v. Roth,
    132 N.J.L. 213, 38 A.2d 862, 864; In re Stabile, 348
    Pa. 587, 36 A.2d 451, 458; Shreveport Long Leaf
    Lumber Co. v. Wilson, D.C.La., 38 F.Supp. 629, 631,
    632. Not for a mere special or temporary purse,
    but with the present intention of making a
    permanent home, for an unlimited or indefinite
    period. In re Garneau, 127 F. 677, 62 C.C.A. 403;
    In re Gilbert's Estate, 15 A.2d 111, 117, 118, 18 N.J.
    Misc. 540; In re Schultz' Estate, 316 Ill.App. 540,
    45 N.E.2d 577, 582. Davis v. Davis, Ohio App., 57
    N.E.2d 703, 704.
    In international law, a residence at a particular
    place, accompanied with positive or presumptive
    proof of an intention to continue there for
    an unlimited time. State v. Collector of Bordentown,
    32 N.J.Law, 192; Graham v. Graham, 81 N.
    W. 44, 9 N.D. 88; Phillimore, Int. Law 49.
    The word "domicile" is derived from latin "domus",
    meaning home or dwelling house, and domicile is legal
    conception of "home". In re Schultz' Estate, 316 Ill.App.
    45 N.E.2d 577, 582, 316 Ill.App. 540.
    The established, fixed, permanent, or ordinary dwellingplace
    or place of residence of a person, as distinguished
    from his temporary and transient, though actual, place of
    residence. It is his legal residence, as distinguished from
    his temporary place of abode; or his home, as distinguished
    from a place to which business or pleasure may
    temporarily call him. Towson v. Towson, 126 Va. 640, 102
    S.E. 48, 52.
    "Citizenship," "habitancy," and "residence" are severally
    words which in the particular case may mean precisely
    the same as domicile. Baker v. Keck, D.C.Ill., 13 F.Supp.
    487. Earley v. Hershey Transit Co., D.C.Pa., 55 F.Supp.
    981, 982; Dodd v. Lorenz, 210 Iowa 513, 231 N.W. 422,
    424; Commonwealth ex rel. Fortney v. Bobrofskie, 329
    Pa. 44, 196 A. 489, 490; Perkins v. Guaranty Trust Co.,
    of New York, 274 N.Y. 250, 8 N.E.2d 849, 852.
    "Domicile" and "residence," however, are frequently
    distinguished, in that domicile is the home, the fixed place
    of habitation; while residence is a transient place of dwelling.
    Fisher v. Jordan, C.C.A.Tex., 116 F.2d 183, 186;
    Minick v. Minick, 111 Fla. 469, 149 So. 483, 488; Hartzler
    v. Radeka, 265 Mich. 451, 251 N.W. 554.
    Domicile may be deemed to be of three sorts,—domicile
    by birth, domicile by choice, and domicile by operation of
    law. The first is the common case of the place of birth,
    domicilium originis; the second is that which is voluntarily
    acquired by a party, proprio motu; the last is consequential,
    as that of the wife arising from marriage. Story,
    Confl. Laws, § 46. And see Railroad Co. v. Kirnbrough, 115
    Ky. 512, 74 S.W.

  5. #5
    Site Supporter OlongJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    "carbine-infested rural (and suburban) areas"
    Some states specifically provide for protection of camp sites with firearms.
    .
    -----------------------------------------
    Not another dime.

  6. #6
    Chasing the Horizon RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Central FL
    This is for the State of Florida; I am not a lawyer (not even close), and YMMV, but: Our statutes are outlined here:

    http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/...0790/0790.html

    The Open Carry section is 790.053, which generally bans open carry. However, later on, in 790.25, they go on to say:

    "The provisions of ss. 790.053 and 790.06 do not apply in the following instances, and, despite such sections, it is lawful for the following persons to own, possess, and lawfully use firearms and other weapons, ammunition, and supplies for lawful purposes:"

    and then describe Lawful Use to include:

    "(h) A person engaged in fishing, camping, or lawful hunting or going to or returning from a fishing, camping, or lawful hunting expedition;"

    To which I would expect allows me to open carry while camping in a tent?

    I'd be very interested if there are any actual legal opinions on this subject here on p-f.
    Last edited by RJ; 02-17-2019 at 06:06 PM.

  7. #7
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Sierra Nevada Mtns, CA
    Reminds me back in the day when I thru-hiked the Pacific Crest Trail, my father had to give a deposition on some lawsuit/lawyer think. They asked about his sons and where they lived. His reply, “somewhere in the desert in Southern California.” Which confused the guy asking the questions and it took about 10 minutes for my father to explain that it is possible to be homeless.

  8. #8
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich_Jenkins View Post

    I'd be very interested if there are any actual legal opinions on this subject here on p-f.

    Me too. For a large part, the question is academic for me, given that I can move permitted through most close by states; WA, ID, MT...

    On occasion, I've found travel that takes me through this or that corner of OR of late, and I just haven't jumped through the permitting hoops there yet. Question comes up because Mrs SS and I have this convenient and very comfy rooftop adventure tent, so it's always tempting to pull over somewhere attractive and enjoy the great outdoors, rather than do a no-tell motel in town, or just burn the miles to the border. Suffice to say, there is no way she and I are going to hop up there and grab some Zs in the middle of the sticks without, at the very least, the old smoke wagon or better.

    At any rate, sort of a first world problem. It's tough having cool gear like the rooftop pop tent--but the academic question remains.
    ”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB

  9. #9
    Site Supporter JodyH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Mexico
    My understanding is a legally erected tent is treated the same as any other temporary domicile when it comes to the law.
    Last edited by JodyH; 02-17-2019 at 08:00 PM.
    "For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
    -- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --

  10. #10
    Hillbilly Elitist Malamute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Northern Rockies
    I believe the same as most that have commented, but wanted to add that a friend used his tent and location in a field as his physical address (first wall tent on the left past the observatory on the Hipas Observatory Road) for his post office box when he first moved to Fairbanks.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •