Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 61

Thread: The Sig P320 Pro Series has landed

  1. #21

    The Sig P320 Pro Series has landed

    Quote Originally Posted by TCB View Post
    I have a feeling this is what they submitted for testing to be our next duty blaster. Checks all the boxes...
    Booth guy at SHOT said it was their CBP submission, who specíed the DP cut.
    Last edited by wilco423; 02-10-2019 at 04:15 AM.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by wilco423 View Post
    Booth guy at SHOT said it was their CBP submission, who specíed the DP cut.
    Hopefully they release the RMR adapter kits for the Pros and M17s.

    Last I had read the submission was for both DPP and RMR compatibility. With SOCOM picking up the RMR type 2 there needs to be an available kit for the M17 too. Ive seen a picture of the prototype, but it wouldn't surprise me if they restricted the kit to authorized buyers so they can keep pushing their own optics.


  3. #23
    Who has these in stock?

  4. #24
    Member Texaspoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Rc217 View Post
    Who has these in stock?
    I picked mine up at Lone Star Tactical Supply, (832) 478-9604 in Houston. Pretty much our only Sig LE dealer. He has both the Carry and full size versions in stock right now.




    TXPO
    ColdBoreCustom.com
    Certified Glock Armorer
    Certified M&P LE Armorer
    Certifiable Definitely

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Texaspoff View Post
    I picked mine up at Lone Star Tactical Supply, (832) 478-9604 in Houston. Pretty much our only Sig LE dealer. He has both the Carry and full size versions in stock right now.




    TXPO
    Thanks. Any word on the new VTAC?

  6. #26
    I'm giving these a hard look... I think I may be able to live with the DPP footprint. With the Army and ICE contracts specc'ing that cut, seems to me that the footprint is here to stay for a while (and DPP-> ?? adapters would probably be a thing given the amount of guns in service).

    Do you happen to have the SKU for the 3.9" variant? I can find the 4.7" online, but that's not the one I'm looking for.

  7. #27
    Member Texaspoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Rc217 View Post
    Thanks. Any word on the new VTAC?

    They are out there, my distributor called me and asked if I wanted any. I haven't seen one in person yet though.


    TXPO
    ColdBoreCustom.com
    Certified Glock Armorer
    Certified M&P LE Armorer
    Certifiable Definitely

  8. #28
    Member Texaspoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by ssb View Post
    I'm giving these a hard look... I think I may be able to live with the DPP footprint. With the Army and ICE contracts specc'ing that cut, seems to me that the footprint is here to stay for a while (and DPP-> ?? adapters would probably be a thing given the amount of guns in service).

    Do you happen to have the SKU for the 3.9" variant? I can find the 4.7" online, but that's not the one I'm looking for.
    Yes sir, L320CA-9-BXR3-PRO

    This one.




    TXPO
    Last edited by Texaspoff; 02-10-2019 at 04:59 PM.
    ColdBoreCustom.com
    Certified Glock Armorer
    Certified M&P LE Armorer
    Certifiable Definitely

  9. #29
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by tcba_joe View Post
    Hopefully they release the RMR adapter kits for the Pros and M17s.

    Last I had read the submission was for both DPP and RMR compatibility. With SOCOM picking up the RMR type 2 there needs to be an available kit for the M17 too. Ive seen a picture of the prototype, but it wouldn't surprise me if they restricted the kit to authorized buyers so they can keep pushing their own optics.

    The CBP solicitation specifically excluded the rear sight being mounted to the optics cover plate so the gun in the photo you have would be a no go for CBP. That is why the pro series was developed.

    The M17/18 was specíed for the DPP footprint and SIG is supposedly making a Romeo optic with the DPP footprint. If there is a military contract for M17 optics with a DPP footprint, Iím sure Trijicon could whip up an RMR with a DPP footprint. In fact given it was specified for the M17 Iíd be surprised if Trijicon had not prototyped one already.

    SOCOM is sticking with Glock so there is no official need to be able to mount an RMR on an M17.
    Last edited by HCM; 02-10-2019 at 06:11 PM.

  10. #30
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by wilco423 View Post
    Booth guy at SHOT said it was their CBP submission, who specíed the DP cut.
    The CBP solicitation specified it had to be capable of taking both the DPP and the RMR footprints. Iím guessing there is an RMR adaptor plate ?

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

TLG 1970–2016 RIPRampageForTheCure.org