In your opinion that is what he would do? On what do you base your opinion?
With zero training, and obviously zero familiarity with such issues, why are you assuming you know how a cop would react?
Here's the beauty of having such a diversity experience at your fingertips: you don't have to assume or give your opinion about what a cop would do in this situation. There are dozens of cops on this forum! Just ask them!
Hint: the cops who have replied to this thread so far have not said that they would have a standard response of "SHOOT SHOOT SHOOT!!!!"
If a cop got on the bus and shot an innocent, it's just as big of a screw up as if you did it. But again, where are you getting this idea that a cop is going to jump up and open fire?
You have repeatedly told us your policy. We get that. But you're rationalizing by claiming that it's the same thing a cop would do. Where do you have any authority to make such a claim? You have absolutely no idea what a cop would do in this situation, and rather than listen to the people on this forum who do have some idea, you just keep marching along.
You are very skilled at offering non-sequitur "evidence" to bolster your position.
Again: there is a world of difference between seeing a man setting something on fire, and a rambling idiot who stands up and starts belligerently shouting.
The number of active duty LEO's is the least of the ways in which you have violated the discussion chart. You aren't addressing most people's points, you are making wild assertions without basis, and you refuse to drop premises that have been shown as faulty.
I'm trying to find the appropriate language to say this, but your critical-thinking troubles me. It does not help that you do not always express yourself very clearly: sometimes your statements take time to decipher.
Do you mind if I ask how old you are?