Page 6 of 30 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 294

Thread: Why is the DOJ Protecting Jeff Epstein

  1. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by wvincent View Post
    Not to be an idiot, but what is your author name? I would like to check it out.
    Since my pen name isn't "Lester Polfus" I don't think that is an idiot question at all.

    I write as DL Barbur.
    I was into 10mm Auto before it sold out and went mainstream, but these days I'm here for the revolver and epidemiology information.

  2. #52
    Member wvincent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The 605
    ^^^ Gotcha, I will check them out.
    "And for a regular dude I’m maybe okay...but what I learned is if there’s a door, I’m going out it not in it"-Duke
    "Just because a girl sleeps with her brother doesn't mean she's easy..."-Blues

  3. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by wvincent View Post
    ^^^ Gotcha, I will check them out.
    Spoiler alert: It involves a billionaire and sex trafficking.

    Right now I'm only on Amazon. By end of August I should be on all the other outlets with a newly edited manuscript.
    I was into 10mm Auto before it sold out and went mainstream, but these days I'm here for the revolver and epidemiology information.

  4. #54
    Member wvincent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The 605
    Quote Originally Posted by Lester Polfus View Post
    Spoiler alert: It involves a billionaire and sex trafficking.
    No way! That could never happen.
    "And for a regular dude I’m maybe okay...but what I learned is if there’s a door, I’m going out it not in it"-Duke
    "Just because a girl sleeps with her brother doesn't mean she's easy..."-Blues

  5. #55
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW
    Quote Originally Posted by blues View Post
    You can't believe the press. You can't believe the pols. You can't believe Epstein. You can't believe Clinton. You can't believe Trump. Without firsthand knowledge, I'd argue that there's very little confidence you can have in drawing your own conclusions.
    All true. The only conclusion I can draw is we know he’s been found guilty before, so there’s that history repeating thing.

    We also know that many other power players really like banging PYTs. The simplest explanation, and all. People tend to be pretty much what they’ve always been.
    ”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB

  6. #56
    Site Supporter Sensei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Greece/NC
    Quote Originally Posted by TC215 View Post
    I was under the impression that since he pleaded guilty to state crimes, double jeopardy doesn't apply with the federal charges.

    I've charged a few people in federal court after the state DA's office messed up and let them plead to state charges. It's sort of a pain, because the USAO has to get permission from main justice, but it's worth it when there's been a "miscarriage of justice".
    I was listening to Andrew McCarthy today on FNC who erroneously described the plea agreement as pertaining to the federal charges. That confused me since the plea agreement was on FL state charges and were coupled only with a non-prosecution agreement from SDFL. This makes me feel a whole lot better about the charges. Thank you both for the clarification
    I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.

  7. #57
    Abducted by Aliens Borderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Camano Island WA.
    My impression is the DOJ knows some of the players (other than Epstein) and this might become very embarrassing for some people who may have had some involvement in sex trafficking of minors.

    Anyone think I'm off in left field?
    In the P-F basket of deplorables.

  8. #58
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW
    Quote Originally Posted by Borderland View Post

    Anyone think I'm off in left field?
    About the involvement, or the embarrassment becoming public?
    ”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB

  9. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by Lester Polfus View Post
    Since my pen name isn't "Lester Polfus" I don't think that is an idiot question at all.

    I write as DL Barbur.
    Not gonna lie, I googled "Books by Lester Polfus" only to get results from some guitar guy.

  10. #60
    Member Zincwarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Central Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Borderland View Post
    My impression is the DOJ knows some of the players (other than Epstein) and this might become very embarrassing for some people who may have had some involvement in sex trafficking of minors.

    Anyone think I'm off in left field?
    They should. Barr's firm represented him.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •