I wanted to share some observations in regards to the two primary methods utilized in AIWB holster making which help tuck the grip of a firearm in order to aid in effectively concealing it: Claws and integral wedges.
Claws
Claws are usually additional hardware components added to the holster after forming which help to rotate the grip inwards by pressing against the user’s belt. Given the various available designs, the end user can pick and choose different attachments to tailor the amount of tuck to their preference. The downsides are that the extra hardware adds some bulk to the holster and there’s the potential for parts breakage or deformity. I have noticed a tendency for claws or their attachment “wings” to become bent from use over time, which can lessen their effectiveness in tucking the grip in.
Integral Wedges
Holsters with integral wedges are formed in such a way that the shape of the holster itself yaws the grip in towards the wearer. With no additional hardware there’s less worry about parts failure, however, the user doesn’t have as much input on the amount of tuck. In order to achieve more or less grip tucking, the wearer has to loosen or tighten their belt accordingly. A belt that’s too loose can lead to pants not staying up, especially if they’re larger than what the individual would normally wear so as to accommodate the firearm. A belt that’s too tight can cause discomfort either from squeezing the wearer or rotating the holster and firearm so much that they dig in.
In the end, both systems have their pros and cons. Hopefully this is additional, helpful information to reference when choosing a holster.
I welcome feedback and input on this topic.