Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: How durable and reliable is the 1897 Trench Broom?

  1. #1

    How durable and reliable is the 1897 Trench Broom?

    I have an idea...more to come. Mine is a Norinco repro.
    #RESIST

  2. #2
    Frequent DG Adventurer fatdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Rural Central Alabama
    Worst of its kind if run hard, although the last generation Norinco's were a bit sturdier. The old joke in my SASS days was that if you shot a '97 you needed three. One to start the match, one to finish the match when it broke, and one that was away being repaired already.

  3. #3
    My idea was taking it to a @TCinVA class or just handing it to him for him to shoot it until it breaks.
    #RESIST

  4. #4
    Murder Machine, Harmless Fuzzball TCinVA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    I think you are dealing with two separate concepts. Durability and reliability are different things and there's a lot of variability there based on how you choose to define each. And I would argue that however you choose to define those terms, our approach has to be very different than what we are used to when we come to the discussion of shotguns from the perspective of people who are used to Glocks and AR15 pattern rifles.

    My best guess would be this:

    - If you wish to define "durable" and "reliable" as a weapon you can load today, neglect, and still have it function through enough shells to solve a problem 10 years from now, the 1897 clone will probably do that. So would an 870.

    - If you wish to define "durable" and "reliable" as a weapon which will function without major breakages for thousands and thousands of shells run through it with the kind of vigor and recoil control techniques we apply to a defensive shotgun, my guess is you'd break it in short order.

    If you want a gun you can neglect and that will still work after prolonged periods without cleaning or lubrication, a good quality pump gun will do that for you.

    If you want a gun that will chew through tens of thousands of shells without experiencing show-stopping breakages, you are probably best served by a quality semi-automatic shotgun like the Beretta 1301 or the Benelli M4. The good quality sporting semi-automatics on the market are still sporting guns at heart, but they are sporting guns that have been built around the kind of round counts, challenging conditions, and neglect that serious bird hunters put them through.

    Would your 1897 get through a class with me? Probably.

    Would it survive me using it as a primary pump gun for a year? Probably not. I am likely to break something that will shut the gun down in that period of time.
    Last edited by TCinVA; 10-27-2018 at 03:42 PM.
    3/15/2016

  5. #5
    Murder Machine, Harmless Fuzzball TCinVA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Quote Originally Posted by fatdog View Post
    Worst of its kind if run hard, although the last generation Norinco's were a bit sturdier. The old joke in my SASS days was that if you shot a '97 you needed three. One to start the match, one to finish the match when it broke, and one that was away being repaired already.
    One might ask how double barrels became the default gun of serious clay shooters.

    I'd suggest that one of the primary reasons is because they break less.
    3/15/2016

  6. #6
    Site Supporter Trooper224's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Wichita
    Quote Originally Posted by fatdog View Post
    Worst of its kind if run hard, although the last generation Norinco's were a bit sturdier. The old joke in my SASS days was that if you shot a '97 you needed three. One to start the match, one to finish the match when it broke, and one that was away being repaired already.
    So true it should be carved in stone.
    We may lose and we may win, but we will never be here again.......

  7. #7
    Site Supporter Trooper224's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Wichita
    Quote Originally Posted by TCinVA View Post
    Would your 1897 get through a class with me? Probably.
    Don't bet the rent on that.
    We may lose and we may win, but we will never be here again.......

  8. #8
    Had one come to one of my classes...

    ...it broke.
    I had an ER nurse in a class. I noticed she kept taking all head shots. Her response when asked why, "'I've seen too many people who have been shot in the chest putting up a fight in the ER." Point taken.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by TCinVA View Post
    I think you are dealing with two separate concepts. Durability and reliability are different things and there's a lot of variability there based on how you choose to define each. And I would argue that however you choose to define those terms, our approach has to be very different than what we are used to when we come to the discussion of shotguns from the perspective of people who are used to Glocks and AR15 pattern rifles.

    My best guess would be this:

    - If you wish to define "durable" and "reliable" as a weapon you can load today, neglect, and still have it function through enough shells to solve a problem 10 years from now, the 1897 clone will probably do that. So would an 870.

    - If you wish to define "durable" and "reliable" as a weapon which will function without major breakages for thousands and thousands of shells run through it with the kind of vigor and recoil control techniques we apply to a defensive shotgun, my guess is you'd break it in short order.

    If you want a gun you can neglect and that will still work after prolonged periods without cleaning or lubrication, a good quality pump gun will do that for you.

    If you want a gun that will chew through tens of thousands of shells without experiencing show-stopping breakages, you are probably best served by a quality semi-automatic shotgun like the Beretta 1301 or the Benelli M4. The good quality sporting semi-automatics on the market are still sporting guns at heart, but they are sporting guns that have been built around the kind of round counts, challenging conditions, and neglect that serious bird hunters put them through.

    Would your 1897 get through a class with me? Probably.

    Would it survive me using it as a primary pump gun for a year? Probably not. I am likely to break something that will shut the gun down in that period of time.
    Good stuff. I should have said something like “how durable and also, how reliable is it?” I do know the difference between the two, @ToddG drilled it into my head

    It’s yours if you want to play with it. With bayonet if you like.
    #RESIST

  10. #10
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    At least you'll have a spear at the end of the day

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •