Page 3 of 15 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 150

Thread: U.S Army switching to 6.8mm

  1. #21
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Canton GA
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    I seem to recall the .277 started as a wildcat round called the .277 Wolverine ?
    I do not know about 277 USA but I believe 277 Wolverine is 223 based - similar to 300 BO but with a 6.8 projectile. You see it discussed on the 6.8 Forum. I have 6.8 SPC and 6.5G AR uppers so I spend time on those forums. 9 vs 45 discussions are nothing compared to 6.5G vs 6.8SPC "discussions".

  2. #22
    Revolvers Revolvers 1911s Stephanie B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    East 860 by South 413
    Quote Originally Posted by HCountyGuy View Post
    I’m putting my chips down on “never”.
    If we have to march off into the next world, let us walk there on the bodies of our enemies.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by the Schwartz View Post
    Since the trend always seems to be towards a larger caliber...
    ???
    Historically the trend is to a smaller caliber. A Brown Bess was a .72 and a Charleville was a .69; Mid-19th Century .50 - .54, then .45-70, then 30-40...

    The M1 Garand was supposed to be a .276, but they had all this .30-'06 laying around...
    After WWII, the Brits were pushing for something in a .27x too, but we rammed .308 Winchester 7.62x51 through, because.
    Recovering Gun Store Commando. My Blog: The Clue Meter
    “It doesn’t matter what the problem is, the solution is always for us to give the government more money and power, while we eat less meat.”
    Glenn Reynolds

  4. #24
    Member Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Utah
    Many years ago I read (or hallucinated) that those dirty Nazis did extensive testing of various calibers (probably shooting live prisoners) and concluded a 6mm midpowered cartridge was ideal for rifles and automatic weapons.

    Anything larger/faster was overkill for dropping the typical human male.

    Does this sound familiar to anyone else?
    Don’t blame me. I didn’t vote for that dumb bastard.

  5. #25
    Member JHC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Georgia
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    there was at least one, the .264 USA that was a 6.8mm.
    Oh. I thought 6.8 = .270

    But I dunno.
    I just crushed a big bottle. 😉
    “Remember, being healthy is basically just dying as slowly as possible,” Ricky Gervais

  6. #26
    We should go the other way, 4.5 mm at 6,000 FPS.
    Last edited by Bucky; 10-19-2018 at 08:07 PM.

  7. #27
    Dirty NAZI assault rifle work started at 7mm but they had all those 8mm reamers...
    Code Name: JET STREAM

  8. #28
    Member olstyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Minnesota
    Quote Originally Posted by JHC View Post
    Oh. I thought 6.8 = .270

    But I dunno.
    I just crushed a big bottle. 😉
    You're not wrong. .264" = 6.7056 mm

  9. #29
    Site Supporter Mjolnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Not sure, really
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg View Post
    Many years ago I read (or hallucinated) that those dirty Nazis did extensive testing of various calibers (probably shooting live prisoners) and concluded a 6mm midpowered cartridge was ideal for rifles and automatic weapons.

    Anything larger/faster was overkill for dropping the typical human male.

    Does this sound familiar to anyone else?
    No.

    Doesn’t sound familiar.

    Ze Germans were very intellectual - as they are now.

    We knew that a small deer and a man are “close enough” and firing rapidly and accurately requires a smaller cartridge.

    No evil required for that.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    East Greenwich, RI
    I’m going to buck the trend and say this will happen. SAW first. Rifles only to Infantry. The .223 isn’t going away.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •