I agree. I’ve reviewed the film several times and it appears that the kid was appendix carrying the gun.
Before I start, I have no sympathy for the burglar who lost half his face. However, looking through the lens of a very liberal Phili DA, Larry Krasner, this kid’s family may have some problems. First, I’m not seeing where the mother was attacked. What I do see is the man reaching into register to steal money and the mother trying to stop him. At no time do I see him produce a weapon or attempt to strangle the mother as was initially told to the police and then reported by several news outlets. This goes to the question as to whether lethal force was justified under PA law. I also wonder if the DA’s office is going to be OK with a 14-yr old carrying in the family business. I can’t help but notice that reporting from Phili news agencies is starting correct the record and break away from the family’s narrative that what prompted the shooting was an attack on the mother. Moreover, it is never good when the person doing the shooting is melanocyte-impaired, the lead recipient is unarmed, and the liberal DA is about as anti-gun as they come.