I have to wonder if there will eventually be a point at which people decide the juice isn't really worth the squeeze when it comes to going thinner and smaller. The more I shoot my Shield, the more I have to ask "is it really worth the added difficulty shooting this gun over a G26?"
Maybe it's just my personal taste, but given how easy it is to shoot modern double stack subcompacts like the G26, I have to ask how much of a difference 3mm of width actually makes with regards to concealment.
With the rapid developments in holster technology, the P365 is becoming a mouse fart in a hurricane.
More people are concealing full size firearms than ever before.
I spoke to Wilhelm Bubits a few years back when he brought out the Caracal, we were talking about pistol width. He, being a designer/engineer, stated it was the magazine width that determined the width of the gun. His subcompact Caracal, yet to surface over in the states is only 23 mm wide, which is 0.9 or basically a tad less than Kahr. His subcompact held 13 rounds in the magazine. This was afforded by the mag spring that would wind concentrically on itself as it was compressed. I dont think the the SIG mag is all that special. Furthermore, the Karh has an offset feed ramp which may or may not be under patent currently. The offset allows for a super slim slide.
I have no doubt others will follow. Just like the Walther PPS kinda set the stage for quality sub singlestacks.
Not an engineer, but how hard would it be to make something like a G26S using a G43 slide like they did with the G30S, but tapering the frame just beyond the magazine well. Thats one of the things I love about a BHP/P-35 is the slim profile like a single stack but with a double stack magazine to fill the hand.
Last edited by leathermaneod; 09-26-2018 at 04:56 AM.