Its like traveling back in time to when guys started running red dots on their rifles.
Welcome to Africa, bring a hardhat.
What for ? Duty guns.
The M17/M18 are RDS capable and CBP, the largest LE Agency in North America has included RDS capability. Several major LE Agencies have approved RDS Guns, most recently the Houston PD.
There are more / better MRDS in the pipeline. They will improve and eventually become the standard the same way Tasco pro points and Aimpoint 5000s paved the way and eventually became the third generation M68 CCO of today. At this point it is simply a matter of engineering.
When the military or another large GOV organization puts out a big enough requirement, and they will, you will see the next generation of MRDS.
Re: micro dots on rifles, the Aimpoint micro T2 is the standard RDS for The Army’s Ranger Regiment among others so not sure what you are talking about.
Everything you just said about pistol RDS is what people said about RDS on carbines in the 1990s and we know how that turned out.
It is, but I also didn't say "The only problem is...." when there's multiple documented issues easily searchable on youtube or google. Gun gallery near where I'm stationed has a FNP 45T that eats RMR's, it's now on it's 3rd or 4th Trijicon RMR. The "Gold Standard." You can feel free to call them right now and ask.
Multiple issues for what dot? We all know delta points are gamer dots. We know there are a bunch of dots that arent capable. We know there were battery contact issues for gen 1 RMRs.
We just had a thread on direct milling vs adapter plates for optic mounting. I wouldnt say the FNP 45T is a great case for red dot durability, first its an adapter plate, second its a case of 1.
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
45T has lots of issues and is old mount technology. The optic is only half the equation. Mounting MRDS on pistols is an engineering challenge. The reliability of MRDS on pistols has been far better in tight fitting custom milled slides like those done by ATEI than in first generation modular optics mounts such as the MOS and CORE systems.
FN thinks they have a better way to do a modular optics mount in the 509 Tactical which addresses these issues. Time will tell but if it works as advertised we have just seen modular optics mounting on pistols go from Gen 1 to Gen 2.
If it's a case of one, how are you saying "I wouldn't say the FNP 45T is a great case for red dot durability." ? Also what happens when the government or a PD authorizes a particular brand of dot over the "Gold standard" also if the Trijicon RMR is the gold standard how is the FNP killing it so consistently? You can try to blame the shop but gun gallery has a solid reputation and does solid work. So what's next?