FWIW... I use OnPay for Payroll with QB integration.
They also support Xero, which I have not done much research on... https://www.xero.com/us/
If anyone has any info to share on Xero, I'd be interested..
FWIW... I use OnPay for Payroll with QB integration.
They also support Xero, which I have not done much research on... https://www.xero.com/us/
If anyone has any info to share on Xero, I'd be interested..
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
Try Xero. I switched from QB two years ago. It is less expensive and pretty easy to use. Easy to integrate Credit Cards Via Stripe or Square and will download the bank transactions.Originally Posted by Tom_Jones
www.xero.com
Square is not gun friendly.
Don't know about Stripe.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
I’m pretty unhappy that I signed up for Mint.com and will be bailing out of that asap. In retrospect, what a stupid idea!
I just did the "delete account" and with the exit questionnaire I told them I no longer trusted their integrity enough to allow them to have my financial information based on their dealings with Gunsite, etc.
Sorta around sometimes for some of your shitty mod needs.
Representative Jeb Hendsarling (R-Tx)has a strong 2nd amendment record. But I think he elected to step out of the batters box yesterday on CNBC with this comment.
"Anybody who believes in the Second Amendment is free not to do business with Citi and free not to do business BofA," Hensarling, who is not seeking re-election, said in a "Squawk Box" interview. "There are plenty of other banks out there who respect the Second Amendment perhaps even more." The Texas Republican, who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said private institutions, including large national banks, should be able to have their own culture.
Culture? Since when does your culture give you the right to discriminate against legal activity? I am very disappointed. People like Hensarling (House Financial Services Committee) should be the vanguard ensuring fair and equal access to banking services. Very disappointing.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/22/hens...gunmakers.html
Last edited by Pacioli; 05-23-2018 at 05:47 AM. Reason: Add link to source
It's America. They're free to run their business as they see fit, and you're free to do business with them or business or not. Companies and corporations have been doing stuff to other companies and corporations forever, so this is nothing new. It's just aimed at gun related companies and gun owners, and those are not protected classes.
"Gunfighting is a thinking man's game. So we might want to bring thinking back into it."-MDFA
Beware of my temper, and the dog that I've found...
If you believe in a free market, there should be no protected classes and no right to forbid classes access to the market. Free market means free access to the marketplace. Restricting access to a certain segment that could otherwise participate is, by definition, anti-free market. If you offer widgets for $x, everyone with $x can buy a widget.
What we are seeing is a regulated market where those with more economic pull are deciding what's good for the rest of us. It is a smaller version of a cartel, but with social engineering as the goal instead of profit manipulation. If you believe that supply and demand set price, restricting supply of financial options for gun related businesses will necessarily increase the price they pay for financing, etc.
Sorta around sometimes for some of your shitty mod needs.
Several recent court decisions would tend to disagree with you. I personally agree that businesses should be free to run their businesses as they see fit and you can in turn take your money elsewhere, but the courts don't seem to hold that opinion:
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-...edding-n833321
https://aclu-co.org/court-rules-bake...st-gay-couple/
My position is that if you are open for business, you are open for business for everyone. I thought we settled this in the 60s.
Reply With Quote