You guys haven't seen nothing yet! The next round of leadership will make Moonbeam look like Bismark.
California is done. It's over. It really is sad as if it wasn't for the politics of the state it would be paradise.
Sometimes I think my voting strategy needs to change, instead of trying to prevent the collapse of the state, I should try to hasten the day. Perhaps once the state collapses on itself and can no longer support all those who are sucking off of the taxpayers hard work, the leaches will leave for greener pastures and those who are left can try to rebuild with the knowledge of what awaits those who follow the same path again? Unlikely I know but the best chance there is.
It's sad but people flee California and then vote in the same values in their new home. Just like people fleeing Latin America.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=10uX2EhSflA
Last edited by TheNewbie; 04-03-2018 at 04:34 PM.
Last edited by critter; 04-03-2018 at 05:31 PM. Reason: I'm illiterate
You will more often be attacked for what others think you believe than what you actually believe. Expect misrepresentation, misunderstanding, and projection as the modern normal default setting. ~ Quintus Curtius
You will more often be attacked for what others think you believe than what you actually believe. Expect misrepresentation, misunderstanding, and projection as the modern normal default setting. ~ Quintus Curtius
"You win 100% of the fights you avoid. If you're not there when it happens, you don't lose." - William Aprill
"I've owned a guitar for 31 years and that sure hasn't made me a musician, let alone an expert. It's made me a guy who owns a guitar."- BBI
You will more often be attacked for what others think you believe than what you actually believe. Expect misrepresentation, misunderstanding, and projection as the modern normal default setting. ~ Quintus Curtius
Legal question:
So, I understand that agencies can implement stricter policies than the US Constitutional standard (ex: PERF 30 rules vs the US Constitution).
What if this CA baloney becomes law, and an officer is charged criminally because under their new 20/20 hindsight subjective standard they feel s/he is wrong? Can that officer then appeal all the way up to federal courts and have the law struck down because it is in obvious conflict with the US Constitutional standard, or does some nuance of current case law allow a state to institute a stricter legal (not policy) standard in conflict with Graham v Connor, Garner v TN, et al?
"Are you ready? Okay. Let's roll."- Last words of Todd Beamer