Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 56

Thread: The Five Yard Problem

  1. #11
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Southern NV
    Some thoughts on the Tueller Principle/Drill:

    The Tueller Drill Myth: Why The 21 Foot Rule Isn’t a Rule At All
    https://www.itstactical.com/warcom/f...a-rule-at-all/

    The Tueller Drill Revisited
    https://armedcitizensnetwork.org/the...rill-revisited
    Last edited by SiriusBlunder; 02-27-2018 at 10:23 AM.

  2. #12
    Nice drills, I dry and live fire practice the hell out of 5-7, probably 70%. I typically use 3 inch stickie circles or horizontal post it notes.

  3. #13
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    I shot these drills at 5 yards. Whenever I spend to much time at 15-25 yards I feel like my first round takes forever to fire when I move up. Recording myself reminds me to do both on a regular basis.

  4. #14
    Very interesting topic, and as usual Tom Givens gives us things to consider. My thoughts:

    Primarily practicing at 7-25 doesn’t necessarily make you proficient at 3-5 yards.

    Primarily practicing at 3-5 is unlikely to make you proficient at 7-50 yards.

    You need to ask what your goal is — is it to survive a typical gun fight, develop competition skills, or survive an unlikely gun fight. Answering that question can inform how you organize your shooting practice.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  5. #15
    Member JHC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Georgia
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    Very interesting topic, and as usual Tom Givens gives us things to consider. My thoughts:

    Primarily practicing at 7-25 doesn’t necessarily make you proficient at 3-5 yards.

    Primarily practicing at 3-5 is unlikely to make you proficient at 7-50 yards.

    You need to ask what your goal is — is it to survive a typical gun fight, develop competition skills, or survive an unlikely gun fight. Answering that question can inform how you organize your shooting practice.
    I don't often use my practice time at 3-5 yards but when I've been put there shooting administered standards, the speed adjusts and the hits are there. That said, this cool "Round up" will definitely get some attention. I make a special attempt to have less experienced family shooters get regular time in on 3-5 yard shooting however so they can internalize just how fast they can go and still get hits.
    “Remember, being healthy is basically just dying as slowly as possible,” Ricky Gervais

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Rochester Hills, MI
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    Very interesting topic, and as usual Tom Givens gives us things to consider. My thoughts:

    Primarily practicing at 7-25 doesn’t necessarily make you proficient at 3-5 yards.

    Primarily practicing at 3-5 is unlikely to make you proficient at 7-50 yards.

    You need to ask what your goal is — is it to survive a typical gun fight, develop competition skills, or survive an unlikely gun fight. Answering that question can inform how you organize your shooting practice.
    Shouldn’t we be striving for all 3?


    Sent from mah smertfone using tapathingy

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    East Greenwich, RI
    Speed become MUCH more important the closer the engagement. Closeness tends to negate marksmanship skills to a degree and emphasizes speed with acceptable accuracy.

    Most anyone can get hits at bad breath range. The key is to get them first. For me personally, if I’m stacking bullets at 5 yards, it tells me I need to shoot faster and that I’m spending too much time seeing more than I need to see for the problem I need to solve.

    So many people fail to put an emphasis on the draw. At close range, especially when we might be starting behind the power curve, speed is life.

    Good article and addressed a very important issue. Shooting at distance isn’t the same as shooting at ATM range. And like George mentioned above, we should be working to cover all of our potential threats, close and far.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by hufnagel View Post
    Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't 7 yards the minimum reaction distance for an assailant?
    There are no do-overs, so there's no minimum reaction distance. React as best you can regardless of the space space between you and the assailant.

  9. #19
    ECQC helps one clarify these issues.

  10. #20
    Member Zincwarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Central Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Givens View Post
    The Five Yard Problem

    Of almost 70 student involved shootings, almost 90% occurred in the 3-5 yard distance envelope. If we make it 3-7 yards, that covers over 92% of the incidents. The FBI and DEA have found very similar results in their agent involved shootings. Five yards is about one car length, and is a very common engagement distance.

    SWAT Magazine just published an excellent article on how to practice for engagements at this distance and how to measure and gauge your skill in this critical area. See https://www.swatmag.com/article/five...86&vsoid=A9486
    Thats the distance I was prepared for. However with Sunderland and the school shootings, I have become increasingly concerned about distances up to 25 yards. My eyesight precludes worrying about further than that. I practice such for competition, but my CC (M&Pc) while great is not a 25
    yard gun.
    Last edited by Zincwarrior; 02-27-2018 at 01:24 PM.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •