For general purpose ARs,which for me is competition and hunting, I've always used some type of low power variable optic that starts a 1x (or at least close to it). This is by far the most popular choice in multigun competition, but I think that is mainly based on the rule set. Most matches use a single optic rule to differentiate the "Tactical" division from "Open." Most shooters don't want to use a rifle that puts them in Open because their handgun and shotgun are not "competitive" in Open.
My interest has recently shifted from traditional multigun matches to DMR type matches (like this) and 2 gun. For these matches, having an optic with more magnification, an exposed (accurate and repeatable) elevation turret, adjustable parallax, and a larger objective to make positional shooting at higher magnifications easier are a distinct advantage.
I could even switch without much of a weight penalty compared to my current LPVO. A Leupold VX3i LRP 4.5-14x50 and an offset RDS are about the same weight as my current LPVO. To me this seems like a substantially more capable setup with little downside (other than shooting in Open in 2 gun and 3 gun).
Does anyone have significant experience comparing the scope and offset RDS vs. an LPVO? What was your preference?
I've used offset irons quite a lot, but have very little experience with an offset RDS.