Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: “I couldn’t hit it sideways”

  1. #1
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Mt Olympus, Los Angeles, CA, United States

    “I couldn’t hit it sideways”

    So I built an AR-15 and an AR-10 with JP Rifles’ components on Turnbull case hardened steel receivers. The AR-15 is dimensioned milspec and I got it to run like a top and shoot 55gr Armscor ammo into a single hole at 50 yards, so far. Not so with the AR-10 that wears an extra high Picatinny rail. I have tried two scope setups, a USO MST-100 in 30mm steel Badger Ordnance rings with an inch insert, and a Schmidt & Bender 3-12x50 PM II in 34mm steel Badger Ordnance rings. Each runs out of windage adjustments before I can align the point of aim with the point of impact at 50 yards. All optics are mounted on the upper receiver rail. The rifle runs fine otherwise.
    Name:  Turnbull09.jpg
Views: 509
Size:  20.9 KB
    I am conjecturing two possibilities:
    1. The axis of the barrel threads is misaligned with the axis of the bolt carrier;
    2. The axis of the Picatinny rail runs in a plane different from that of the axis of the barrel.
    How can I measure these alignments?
    Michael@massmeans.com | Zeleny@post.harvard.edu | westcoastguns@gmail.com | larvatus prodeo @ livejournal | +1-323-363-1860 | “If at first you don’t succeed, keep on sucking till you do succeed.” — Curly Howard, 1936 | “All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” — Samuel Beckett, 1984

  2. #2
    New Member schüler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    TX
    I've seen similar issues when an inclined rail is combined with an inclined uni-mount but that's not what you have. I assume the rings/inserts are level plane? Some inserts will allow inclination.

    I would think a 50yd zero would still be doable... but have you tried 100yd?

    A cleaning rod in barrel with a cleaning rod or orher straight edge placed flat on receiver rail might indicate gross angular differences.

    Collimator or bore laser might be helpful.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Georgia
    My first take would be to detach the upper, pull the BCG, and sight down the bore at a convenient reference point while the upper is held in or resting on something. Then eyeball the rail and see if it's anywhere close.

    This is how I boresight new sights before taking the gun to the range. I also have a laser boresighter tool that I can use at home. Both should at least get you on paper at 25 yards, then you can back out as desired. Any gross misalignment should be visible this way.
    "Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." - R. A. Heinlein

  4. #4
    Member StraitR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Basking in sunshine
    A bore laser would no doubt tell the tale at distance, but I would think that much runout should be noticeable when looking at how centered the barrel is in the handguard, if in fact the upper and handguard are square. Run a straight edge (steel yard stick) down each side of the receiver and rail to confirm they are square.

    Easy test, given it won't zero at 50, is to separate the upper/lower, remove the BCG, set the upper on something sturdy and sight a target at distance through the bore, then compare to what you see in the scope.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •