T2 vs h2, technical

[Unobtanium]

I have noted the spec difference regarding operating temperatures , and submersion capabilities...but what's the reality?

It makes no logistical sense for aimpoint to stock 2 kinds of electronic suites, 2 kinds of 0 rings, 2 kinds of whatever. Absolutely none.

So is the H2 just as capable as the t2, and the cost difference is due to testing? Similar to an HPT bolt costing more than one that isn't, even though they are made on the same line seconds apart of the same material treated the Same? Or is there a true physical difference between the two optics aside from the brightness adjustment and nvd coatings?

[Artemas2]

https://bigtexoutdoors.com/blogs/new...t-micro-sights

The H series sights are identical in every way to the T series with the following exceptions: The T Series is night vision compatible & has a higher water depth rating; (25 meters whereas the H has a rating of 5 meters.)

Oddly enough I got a T2 with a mount from Larue last year for less than stores that were selling the H2s at

[Unobtanium]

https://bigtexoutdoors.com/blogs/new...t-micro-sights

biggest difference is the T model has modes for NVGs

I'm trying to understand if the temp and submersion differences are valid.

[OldRunner/CSAT Neighbor]

Well DB or Wayne can surely set ya straight on this, perhaps they’ll stop in @ some point.

[HCM]

I have noted the spec difference regarding operating temperatures , and submersion capabilities...but what's the reality?

It makes no logistical sense for aimpoint to stock 2 kinds of electronic suites, 2 kinds of 0 rings, 2 kinds of whatever. Absolutely none.

So is the H2 just as capable as the t2, and the cost difference is due to testing? Similar to an HPT bolt costing more than one that isn't, even though they are made on the same line seconds apart of the same material treated the Same? Or is there a true physical difference between the two optics aside from the brightness adjustment and nvd coatings?

Is there a true physical difference ? Yes.

Is the difference significant to most non military users ? No.

ICE issues H-1’s and the FBI issues H2’s on regular Agent carbines. Thousands in the field with no major issues.

[blues]

Is there a true physical difference ? Yes.

Is the difference significant to most non military users ? No.

ICE issues H-1’s and the FBI issues H2’s on regular Agent carbines. Thousands in the field with no major issues.

I purchased an H2 for my rifle a couple years back as I figured I wasn't going to be swimming my rifle or engaging in underwater ops. So far my decision has been prudent. I guess if that changes, my next to last thought might be, "damn, I shoulda got that T2!"

[LittleLebowski]

I only buy the H series, or at least I did until I found the Primary Arms micros.

[M2CattleCo]

I've always used the Ts because I go overboard on everything. Haven't had one fail me yet!

[Erick Gelhaus]

I only buy the H series, or at least I did until I found the Primary Arms micros.

Would you put a Primary Arms micro on a semi auto shotgun?

[orionz06]

I would question if it were a "tested to" kinda thing. T's and H's tested to different depths and come off of different lines? I agree that the differing sku's with similar products could be a mess.