Why didn’t I know that Glock got rid of the slide cut out in the Gen 5 34? That is interesting.
“If you know the way broadly you will see it in everything." - Miyamoto Musashi
I think what’s most surprising (at least to me) in this thread is that @GJM is still using the DPP as a CO sight. I figured you would have moved on to greener pastures by now. Your failure rate with those optics is quite frankly, astounding.
Shoot more, post less...
So I got to play with the G5 G34 and I am impressed, the only thing keeping me from ever getting one is the MOS. IT pushes the rear sight all the way to the rear and there's actually an overhang with the rear sight now. I WILL get one if they make a non-MOS model. My Gen4 G34 has trijicon HD's on it, and that's a must for me on a Gen5. But I like the changes. They did get rid of the cut out, but removed material internally to keep the mass the same.
I have shot a pair of Gen 5 34 MOS pistols enough to form an impression —I love them!
Running both with DP Pro Optics and stock trigger parts, excepting a 5.0 striker spring. Have a third G5/34 inbound, that I plan to try an RMS Shield optic on it. Really, really enjoying how they recoil and, of course, their big mag well. Repeatedly getting sub two inch five shot groups at 25 yards with American Eagle 115 ball. Yet to experience a stoppage with any ammo I have tried. PMC 115 shoots 1-2 inches right of the AE 115 at 25 yards.
Nobody tell Gabe about this post.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
Another voice in the wilderness - do a non-MOS version and I’m there.
George, if you do not mind me asking, what size dot are you running on your DP Pro?
Thanks very much.