I find that hybrid holsters are mostly worn by folks that don’t carry full time.
That’s not a knock, necessarily. But I get that people, “new,” to carrying want as least intrusive a holster as possible. And that makes sense. Spreading the belt attachments over a wider area, allowing the holster to remain thin, makes sense.
However, there ARE better ways to skin that cat.
The Milt Sparks Versatac III, the Comptac CTAC and the JMCK/JRC Hybrid are the way to go in outboard attachment holsters.
See, the problem with many hybrids and why you won’t see them on the hips of the cognoscenti here, is that the pad, whether thin leather, or neoprene or whatever foam they use, that gives the rig such a comfortable feel, collapses under the pressure of the belt when the gun is removed, and it makes reholstering potentially dangerous. Uninformed users will, “rock,” “pick,” or, “saw,” their pistol back into their holster, all the whilst pointing their muzzle squarely at themselves. You can break one of the four Firearms safety rules and be ok, but break two, and something is getting shot. People who aren’t trained break the rules frequently...
Thus, you won’t see much enthusiasm for hybrids here.
If you want conventional IWB, I think the JMCK #3 in the Givens configuration is the bee’s knees of that style of holster. I have them for G19, M&P FS, K frame, L frame and 1911, which is anything and everything I might ever have to use in my life.
I’m glad you changed your answer on the rounds you’ve fired since 1998...like most of the weirdos here, I’ve fired several hundred since Breakfast...
civiliandefender.com