Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Low Power Variable (1-4) for a PCC?

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    In exile
    This thread seems appropriate for me right now. I had a club level pistol/carbine match this weekend. We always have a "long distance" stage, usually shots at 100, 200 and 300 yards. I have yet to finish this stage under par time. I use a Aimpoint Pro and it is zeroed at 50 yards which should get me on target at 200 too. I did make my 100 and 200 yards shot but failed on the 300. My most limiting factor was not my red dot. It was me and my nerves + breathing. I'm in good shape, I workout 5-6 days per week but it was hard to keep that dot from wondering all over the target. I finally realized that taking several deep breaths and then holding and squeezing was the way to go but too late. The dot wasn't too big, it was my lack of stability in a forced uncomfortable position that did me in. Maybe some magnification would help but it's out to the rifle range for me for some work.

  2. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Quote Originally Posted by navyman8903 View Post
    I would skip the Green, you'll find the Trij Accupowers both 1-4 and 1-8 are much cheaper than the red variants and there's a reason for that. The Green is not daylight bright in more than a few situations.


    I once again recommend the P4Xi. I'll buy it off you if you hate it.

    Mrgunsandgear:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRm4rU2bK3Q&t=188s

    It also mad his top 5 for 2017. Which is pretty serious if you see all of the things he reviewed, including the accupower 1-4.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2GRm5sXVQ4&t=625s
    I would consider it but I hate that reticle a lot. I hate most of the ones I'm seeing so far. The Vortex Viper PST 1-4 is really close to what I'd like. The Eotech Vudu SR-1 reticle looks fantastic as well.

    Just to clarify it's not that I am trying to keep things cheap; the reason I was looking at 1-4s is because 1-4s are falling out of favor for the 1-6s and 1-8s I can get really good quality 1-4 glass for not much more than I spent on my red dot and I already think 4x is kind of overkill for a PCC so spending the extra dough on a 1-6 or 1-8 seemed kind of silly for a PCC.

  3. #13
    Member Joe Mamma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Land of the Free, Home of the Brave
    Quote Originally Posted by mrozowjj View Post
    I would consider it but I hate that reticle a lot. I hate most of the ones I'm seeing so far. The Vortex Viper PST 1-4 is really close to what I'd like. The Eotech Vudu SR-1 reticle looks fantastic as well.

    Just to clarify it's not that I am trying to keep things cheap; the reason I was looking at 1-4s is because 1-4s are falling out of favor for the 1-6s and 1-8s I can get really good quality 1-4 glass for not much more than I spent on my red dot and I already think 4x is kind of overkill for a PCC so spending the extra dough on a 1-6 or 1-8 seemed kind of silly for a PCC.
    You and I are thinking along the same lines. I currently run a 9mm PCC with a decent quality 1-4x optic. It's a discontinued Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 (MOA reticle with capped turrets). It's a great choice.

    I shoot "close and fast" style competitions with it. I also regularly shoot various sized steel targets out to 200 yards just for fun. I don't think the guys using red dots have any real advantage for "close and fast" shooting. Obviously at distance, magnification is a huge benefit.

    One thing I really like about this setup is the MOA reticle as opposed to the more common reticles with a few caliber specific (irregularly spaced) hash marks. As you probably know, the bullet drop for a PCC is huge as you go further out. The small increments in the MOA reticle (2 MOA hash marks with this scope) are very useful for holdovers with a variety of ammo. I have chrono'd various ammo out of my gun and use a ballistic calculator, so that makes the long distance hits relatively easy.

    If you don't know, Vortex made capped turret and exposed turret versions of this scope. I strongly prefer the capped turrets. Both are discontinued, but you can still get the exposed turret ones in new condition if you look. I think there are some on ebay right now. There is also a place called A&A Optics which sells factory reconditioned ones from time to time.

    Some people complain about the illuminated reticle in this scope not being "daylight bright." That's partially true, but it never bothered me. I mention it because it might bother you.

    Let me know if you have any questions. I am happy to share my experiences.

    Joe Mamma
    Last edited by Joe Mamma; 01-22-2018 at 09:33 PM.

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Mamma View Post
    You and I are thinking along the same lines. I currently run a 9mm PCC with a decent quality 1-4x optic. It's a discontinued Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 (MOA reticle with capped turrets). It's a great choice.

    I shoot "close and fast" style competitions with it. I also regularly shoot various sized steel targets out to 200 yards just for fun. I don't think the guys using red dots have any real advantage for "close and fast" shooting. Obviously at distance, magnification is a huge benefit.

    One thing I really like about this setup is the MOA reticle as opposed to the more common reticles with a few caliber specific (irregularly spaced) hash marks. As you probably know, the bullet drop for a PCC is huge as you go further out. The small increments in the MOA reticle (2 MOA hash marks with this scope) are very useful for holdovers with a variety of ammo. I have chrono'd various ammo out of my gun and use a ballistic calculator, so that makes the long distance hits relatively easy.

    If you don't know, Vortex made capped turret and exposed turret versions of this scope. I strongly prefer the capped turrets. Both are discontinued, but you can still get the exposed turret ones in new condition if you look. I think there are some on ebay right now. There is also a place called A&A Optics which sells factory reconditioned ones from time to time.

    Some people complain about the illuminated reticle in this scope not being "daylight bright." That's partially true, but it never bothered me. I mention it because it might bother you.

    Let me know if you have any questions. I am happy to share my experiences.

    Joe Mamma

    I was looking at the capped MOA one too but as you mention it's discontinued and no longer anywhere to be found. Amazon says they have some back ordered and I can order it and I think I might do that. Worst case they cancel my order. Maybe they'll find one stuffed on a shelf somewhere. If they don't I guess I can go Trijicon. Even knowing the green isn't as bright I still think i'd go green.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by mrozowjj View Post
    I would consider it but I hate that reticle a lot. I hate most of the ones I'm seeing so far. The Vortex Viper PST 1-4 is really close to what I'd like. The Eotech Vudu SR-1 reticle looks fantastic as well.

    Just to clarify it's not that I am trying to keep things cheap; the reason I was looking at 1-4s is because 1-4s are falling out of favor for the 1-6s and 1-8s I can get really good quality 1-4 glass for not much more than I spent on my red dot and I already think 4x is kind of overkill for a PCC so spending the extra dough on a 1-6 or 1-8 seemed kind of silly for a PCC.
    I own a Vortex viper PST 1-4. I will say it us serviceable. Not great at all, much better than a throw away scope for sure. But nothing amazing when you start running it, especially vs other scopes. It is more to do with the not daylight bright. Shooting from variable lighting conditions. And the glass is good, but not great or excellent. The clarity is alright. But not amazing. Again it's a serviceable scope. I have it on my stag M8 which loves 55gr and has a 3.5 Romney trigger in it. It's a fun and fast gun to shoot. Not a bullseye shooter for sure. So I run the past 1-4 on it. A lot of people love them, because it's affordable and obtainable.

    But, it can't hold a candle to the trij you're looking at or even the steiner. Honestly. If you don't like the steiner, then the trij accupower 1-4 in red is the way to go. Skip the green. The accupower will steer you in the right direction with high quality glass and in general a solid buy once cry once overall build quality. The vortex not so much unfortunately. The vortex is cheaper sure. But the trij is better overall in every category. I wouldn't look at the viper at all honestly. If you like the reticle then I'd go with the trij. If you've got more money to spend and like the vudu. I would go with that to give you the extra mag for cleaner shots. Plus the FFP will help if you decide to go full recce.

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Quote Originally Posted by navyman8903 View Post
    Skip the green... Plus the FFP will help if you decide to go full recce.
    The skipping the green makes me sad. I liked the green. It really picks up better for me almost everywhere.

    I have no idea what full recce means.

  7. #17
    Site Supporter JodyH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Mexico
    In the $1000 price range I'm a big fan of the Meopta 1-4 K-Dot.
    I ran one on my 3-gun carbine for several years.
    Nice glass, awesome illumination, good reticle, sturdy as hell.

    Meopta makes the Steyr AUG integrated scope, they have a long track record of military grade scopes.
    Last edited by JodyH; 01-25-2018 at 08:55 AM.
    "For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
    -- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --

  8. #18
    Site Supporter dontshakepandas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Quote Originally Posted by mrozowjj View Post
    The skipping the green makes me sad. I liked the green. It really picks up better for me almost everywhere.

    I have no idea what full recce means.
    http://www.trijicon.com/na_en/produc....php?pid=TR24G

    The green triangle Accupoint may be a good option for you if you are just looking for a red dot replacement. If you need holdovers for longer shots then obviously it wouldn't work for you.

    I have a 1-6 Accupoint with the green triangle that I got as a red dot replacement since my astigmatism makes it harder for me to use a red dot at longer distances. I find that I give up very little in quickness to a red dot, but it does let me be a little more accurate for longer range shots even without magnification since I can use the point of the triangle and it is clear instead of a starburst. Considering where I live it would be very unrealistic for me to take a shot longer than about 150 yards, I don't miss the holdovers at all.

    I have no problems picking up the green, and would imagine the complaints with green being daylight bright really only applies to the battery powered Trijicon scopes.

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by mrozowjj View Post
    The skipping the green makes me sad. I liked the green. It really picks up better for me almost everywhere.

    I have no idea what full recce means.
    Dedicate the rifle you're putting it on for a full recon setup. 14.5-18" barrel with a variable power. Setup to take shots at 300-600 yards. The 1-4 will get you there, but the 1-6 will be better for a RECCE setup. Some guys just run a variable power to run it, and some dudes have intent when setting up the rifle.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •