No, I’m planning on divesting myself from M&Ps and thinking a P365X with a PMM comp and EPS carry will be big/small enough to replace both the M&P compact and shield plus.
Honestly, I’ve come to the conclusion that 15+ rnds of 9mm in anything is more weight than I want to carry. 10-12 in a 365 sized plastic gun just may be my sweet spot.
You won't be disappointed...I switched from shooting mostly 1911's, CZ's, and M&P's to Glocks and 365's (XL and Macro), it's been well worth it. 365 isn't perfect and I agree with those seeking a wider TS, but it's a pretty well thought-out design.
Something that concerns me is a few random YT reports of AD's (I haven't verified these) and comments like the following that was posted in the Sig 320 thread:
@HCM can you summarize the issues you saw or give a link if you've posted details on this here before?Originally Posted by HCM
Off the top of my head
Out of spec takedown levers
Rear sight dovetails cut out of spec / too large
Dead trigger / broken trigger return spring
Back plate retention tab breaking and striker popping out the back
That last one only affects the old design has been addressed in current production.
Zero reports or claims of ADs without trigger being pulled.
Internally the 365 uses a conventional striker safety arrangement. The FCU 365 is also quite different being a casting that is finish machined vs a stamping in the 320.
Last edited by HCM; 07-30-2023 at 09:38 AM.
That's the bit I was most interested in, and was hoping that hadn't changed since I'd seen you post something similar to that, a year or two ago.
You also listed broken trigger return spring. Is that a frequent issue? Haven't seen it with my stable of three, or other folks I know with 365's, but that's a fairly small sample. I did used to get broken TRS on some CZ's, a really annoying issue.