Sig P365 - Single Stack 9mm w/10+1 and 12+1

[Dismas316]

So a couple weeks in and already sig is "tweaking" production of the 365. No mention of the barrel wear that many a complaining about.

[psalms144.1]

So a couple weeks in and already sig is "tweaking" production of the 365. No mention of the barrel wear that many a complaining about.

I read that message and thought it was a GLOCK response - now Sig's can't be limp wristed either!

Seriously, at least they're looking into it and being public about it without going through a bunch of BS like the P320 fiasco. Maybe learning has occurred in Exeter...

[Dismas316]

That's certainly looking on the bright side, yes, glad they are reacting quick but some would question how this was discovered during their testing. But then you have this quote from Bruce Gray.

This was a response from Bruce Gray, on the facebook page-
"Let’s instead focus on what you will carry in your new P365. It won’t be commercially remanufactured or your own reloads. It won’t be any brand of FMJ, much less low-cost training ammo. And it probably won’t even be bulk-packed value-line JHP’s. Rather, you’ll carry first-quality duty / personal defense loads from one of the major players.
That’s what your highly specialized P365 really needs to run with."

[lordhamster]

That's certainly looking on the bright side, yes, glad they are reacting quick but some would question how this was discovered during their testing. But then you have this quote from Bruce Gray.

This was a response from Bruce Gray, on the facebook page-
"Let’s instead focus on what you will carry in your new P365. It won’t be commercially remanufactured or your own reloads. It won’t be any brand of FMJ, much less low-cost training ammo. And it probably won’t even be bulk-packed value-line JHP’s. Rather, you’ll carry first-quality duty / personal defense loads from one of the major players.
That’s what your highly specialized P365 really needs to run with."

If hot ammo is the only requirement, I'd be fine with that. Nato ammo is available enough as target ammo.

[Mike C]

If hot ammo is the only requirement, I'd be fine with that. Nato ammo is available enough as target ammo.

I'd be curious as to what the RSA replacement interval is if the requirement to run proper is linked to hotter ammo. I was thinking at some point I'd be a sell out, eat some crow for all my griping about Sig and try a P365. But looking at the facebook post above I think I'll wait as it still looks like Sig can't get their shit together. Maybe Sig should have just licensed the mag design to other manufacturers that can actually execute and engineer something that works. For those who like Sig I'm not trying to bag on Sig just to be a dick but to stop shipment because there is an issue that was obviously not worked out as they were having the same problems on a reveal/press day is insane to me. Now guns are in customers hands and they have reports of them not working already? Less than a a few weeks? It seriously blows my mind I don't get WTF these dudes are smoking.

[MSparks909]

That's certainly looking on the bright side, yes, glad they are reacting quick but some would question how this was discovered during their testing. But then you have this quote from Bruce Gray.

This was a response from Bruce Gray, on the facebook page-
"Let’s instead focus on what you will carry in your new P365. It won’t be commercially remanufactured or your own reloads. It won’t be any brand of FMJ, much less low-cost training ammo. And it probably won’t even be bulk-packed value-line JHP’s. Rather, you’ll carry first-quality duty / personal defense loads from one of the major players.
That’s what your highly specialized P365 really needs to run with."

If anything I think “hot” defense ammo would exacerbate the issues that seem to be plaguing the P365 as of late; mainly the peening slides and barrels on a good number of pistols.

[ST911]

That's certainly looking on the bright side, yes, glad they are reacting quick but some would question how this was discovered during their testing. But then you have this quote from Bruce Gray.

This was a response from Bruce Gray, on the facebook page-
"Let’s instead focus on what you will carry in your new P365. It won’t be commercially remanufactured or your own reloads. It won’t be any brand of FMJ, much less low-cost training ammo. And it probably won’t even be bulk-packed value-line JHP’s. Rather, you’ll carry first-quality duty / personal defense loads from one of the major players.
That’s what your highly specialized P365 really needs to run with." ​

If this gun isn't Walmart-ammo-reliable, it's dead already.

[JodyH]

If a gun won't run on any SAAMI spec ammo I won't carry it... period.

[GJM]

As much as I enjoy bagging on Sig, I hope they get this thing right. A 43 sized pistol with ten rounds, good trigger and sights, nice checkering and a sloped rear slide for concealment is very attractive.

Bet those that paid $800 on Gunbroker for a Gen 1 365 are thrilled by this development.

[M2CattleCo]

The ones who have Gunbroker also have the internet. Anyone with internet access and the ability to research, read, and comprehend, and then buys anything Sig puts to market right now gets exactly what they had coming to them.