Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 92

Thread: If you were just starting out in 2018...

  1. #31
    Glock 19 and 43.

  2. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Columbus Ohio Area
    Quote Originally Posted by JonInWA View Post
    It depends. If my primary criteria was shootability and carry, I'd say Glock, and more specifically Glock G17, G19, or G19X. They're usually quite dependable, easy to detail-disassemble, and perform do-it-yourself modifications/trigger tuning (in my case, with OEM parts {except for sights and butt-plugs}).

    The original poster mentioned use for church security. If threat management is a possibility, then I'd suggest taking a hard look at pistols with a longer triggerpull, such as HK's LEM-equipped pistols or other DAO options (in my case, a Beretta 92D). Or a DA/SA choice.

    That's not to say that choosing a Glock is a bad alternative-far from it. But for a Glock as a threat management tool I would probably recommend a Gen4, Gen5 or G19X, or in earlier generations using a NY1 trigger spring. In my personal case, as a Security Team leader if I go the Glock route, it's normally going to be my G34 with a NY1 and a minus connector, with Warren Tactical sights-but I'm far more likely to choose my HK P30L V1 LEM or Beretta 92D.

    Best, Jon
    I could be wrong, but I got the impression that he was referring to CCW in church, not church security.

    I generically agree with your assessment for a security role, but I disagree for CCW. For CCW, I don’t really believe you should draw your weapon unless you are firing it. While homicide might have justifiable circumstances, assault with a deadly weapon is probably harder to defend as a justifiable position, from the standpoint of a private citizen.

    Then again...he does live in Texas.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #33
    Site Supporter Hambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Behind the Photonic Curtain
    For one thing I wouldn't spend a decade with P7s.

    Other than that diversion, they're making more Beretta 92 versions than when I bought my first in the '80s. I had to learn to stake 1911 front sights back then, and now I could buy one with dovetail sights AND a beavertail. I still drool on Wilson combat stuff, but now it's internet porn instead of a catalogue.

    If you want a polymer answer maybe a P30 or a G34.
    "Gunfighting is a thinking man's game. So we might want to bring thinking back into it."-MDFA

    Beware of my temper, and the dog that I've found...

  4. #34
    Member JonInWA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Auburn, WA
    Quote Originally Posted by Josh Runkle View Post
    I could be wrong, but I got the impression that he was referring to CCW in church, not church security.

    I generically agree with your assessment for a security role, but I disagree for CCW. For CCW, I don’t really believe you should draw your weapon unless you are firing it. While homicide might have justifiable circumstances, assault with a deadly weapon is probably harder to defend as a justifiable position, from the standpoint of a private citizen.

    Then again...he does live in Texas.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I agree with you, Josh; if he's just a congregant, in that case, shootabiity likely trumps threat management criteria.

    Best, Jon

  5. #35
    Again, thanks for the replies. I go to a very small country church so we’re not prone to being as “organized” as larger ones are. We don’t have a security team so much but there are several of us who are armed on any given Sunday. I started a thread way back on the revolver forum about a GP100 I bought from one of the members, he sits on the far left side as you enter in and I sit on the far right. Guns I suspect being in the building include his Gen 2 Glock 17, my 642, a Shield, and at least two Ruger LCPs and those are just the ones I know about out of a crowd of 20-40 people.
    I’m looking for something that would primarily be used for while at church. I practice with my 642 at the distances involved but that’s not it’s strong suit. It’s great for concealment but that’s less of a issue at church where I have a jacket on.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #36
    Glock support gear and aftermarket parts(sights) are universally available.
    Like others have said, the G19 is a great do it all gun.
    If I could go back in time to 2005 and agency restrictions didn’t exist, I would buy a g19(9 years before I did) and ignore all of the caliber bs and steel gun nonsense that claimed my $ over the years.
    Carry methods are going to be mission dictated. Keep in mind sitting in pews and frequent close contact with fellow parishioners.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #37
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    The Good Part of Western PA
    If I were starting out, I would buy 3 P30’s, and 3 P30sk’s, and call it a day. If only I could go back 15 years, and tell myself to quit being a “Sample Whore” and stick to the P30.

  8. #38
    A Glock 17 or two. I think I bought a 1911 as my first gun because my 2 friends that had pistols had Glocks and I wanted something different.

  9. #39
    Site Supporter Rex G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    SE Texas
    As I will be retiring from LEO-ing later this month, and by March will be able to afford and pair-and-a-spare of just about any fighting handgun I desire, this is not a hypothetical for me. Striker-fired pistols are eliminated from consideration, in the first round, because the protruding, boxy, rear portion of the slide makes concealment difficult. I can conceal my P229 better than a baby Glock, because the outer rear corner of the slide is the greatest challenge to concealment.

    .40 Snap & Whip is eliminated from consideration, because of my aging, aching right wrist. I retired my P229 .40 duty pistol one month after my chief approved 9mm as an alternative duty pistol cartridge. I believe I can eliminate 357 SIG and 10mm, too.

    A steel or stainless-steel frame is desirable, to damp recoil, to spare my aging, aching right wrist. This eliminates plenty of contenders.

    A low bore axis is desirable, to mitigate muzzle flip. This is a strike against SIGs, though an all-stainless P226 might still be a contender.

    The hump on the left side of the P229 frame is a strike against the P229. This hump is not present on the P226, if I recall correctly.

    So, this leaves the P226, with a stainless steel frame, as a leading contender for the prize. Slimmer G10 grip panels would probably be an improvement, over the standard plastic grip panels.

    Having said that, a full-sized, single-column, all-steel, 5” 1911, with a relieved trigger guard and high-cut front strap, is much more to my liking. (I have two Les Baers.) Double-column-mag handguns are more like hands-guns, requiring two hands for best operation. I have toddler and infant grandsons, so a one-hand-gun is better.

    The new Wilson Combat X-something may have low-enough grip-area bulk to work well for me, but I have never seen or handled one.

  10. #40
    THE THIRST MUTILATOR Nephrology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West
    I'd stick with Glock, but more strongly consider the M&P line of pistols.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •