Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 84

Thread: Snub Nosed Revolver Recommendations

  1. #61
    Site Supporter tanner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Detroit adjacent.
    No-lock 642, no-lock 442 or an LCR would work just fine. Add a DSG AIWB clip holster and you have an excellent gym-shorts solution.

  2. #62
    You could always find and FFL to order a S&W 640 from Kieslers for $350, while they still have some in stock.

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by tanner View Post
    Add a DSG AIWB clip holster and you have an excellent gym-shorts solution.
    Indeed. I thought the reports were exaggerated, but I've had mine for a few weeks now and it is my most used holster. The clip will work with a 442 in shorts with no belt. I routinely walk my dog for 3.4 miles or longer and practically forget I am wearing this holster. Holster never comes off with gun. I am liking it better than pocket holster carry. It is so convenient, it eliminates any laziness & excuses for not carrying.

  4. #64
    Was watching a video on the LCR and apparently it has an internal locking system also? Underneath the grips??? If so- what would the difference be between a 642 with lock and the LCR?
    This country needs an enema- Blues approved sig line

  5. #65
    Site Supporter OlongJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    "carbine-infested rural (and suburban) areas"
    The difference is I've never heard of the LCR self-activating due to recoil or being dropped.
    .
    -----------------------------------------
    Not another dime.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by holmes168 View Post
    Was watching a video on the LCR and apparently it has an internal locking system also? Underneath the grips??? If so- what would the difference be between a 642 with lock and the LCR?
    Supposedly, Ruger quit doing this. I dunno:

    http://rugerforum.net/ruger-double-a...rnal-lock.html

    http://rugerforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=245705

  7. #67
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Ft Leavenworth, KS
    Quote Originally Posted by OlongJohnson View Post
    The difference is I've never heard of the LCR self-activating due to recoil or being dropped.
    This. I staked the lock on mine anyway, just to be sure, but there's no pattern of failure like the damn S&W lock.

    Both the LCR and 642 (or 442) are great gym shorts/lounge around guns, or pocket carry as a BUG. Between the two, I have a slight preference for the 642, but they both work fine.

    I also have one of the old 640's, and it's a lot more fun to practice with, but IMHO it's heavy enough that I'd only belt carry it...and if I'm doing that, why not carry something more capable than a snub?

  8. #68
    Picking up the LCR tomorrow, and ordered the DSG holster this evening. I kept putting it off and kept going to the store with no gun and in gym shorts.
    This country needs an enema- Blues approved sig line

  9. #69
    Chasing the Horizon RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Central FL
    Quote Originally Posted by holmes168 View Post
    Picking up the LCR tomorrow, and ordered the DSG holster this evening. I kept putting it off and kept going to the store with no gun and in gym shorts.
    Let us know how it goes.

    I’m taking a sudden interest in this thread.

  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Quote Originally Posted by holmes168 View Post
    Picking up the LCR tomorrow, and ordered the DSG holster this evening. I kept putting it off and kept going to the store with no gun and in gym shorts.
    The LCR will be far more adequate than your current carry. I have found myself going without more than I care to admit.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •