I'm not sure if this merits its own thread or if it should be tacked onto the end of the existing thread, but I figured I'd start fresh. Mods - move it if you wish.
I was at the NRA Carry Guard expo in Milwaukee, WI this past weekend. All in all, very well done. I was there for several days, so if anyone wants details (good, bad, and ugly), let me know. However, on to the purpose of this thread...
I stopped at the Federal Ammunition display and spoke with several reps. I asked about the reported change in the skiving and the performance of the newest batches of P9HST2. I was told the engineers were trying to improve performance through auto glass, as this was the hardest barrier they faced. They reported more jacket separation in auto glass encounters (tests or OIS - I don't know which), and the solution they came up with was a 2nd canilure below the original canilure. This second canilure required a change in the skiving. Expansion and penetration should remain essentially unchanged.
I have no idea if this is what was actually done (I have not pulled a bullet out of my newer HSTs to check). I don't know if it even make ballistic sense, but it is what was told to me by the reps at Federal.