.125 rearOriginally Posted by EVP
.105 front
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
.125 rear
.105 front
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ve shot the Ameriglo U and Bold a LOT. My issue with the Ameriglo U is that the U is cut too deep. Compared to the trijicon HD XRs which is cut just deep enough for the front sight dot to rest in the notch. I prefer the Trijicon HD XRs only for that reason.
Given the choice of Ameriglo’s l prefer the Bold rear with a .125 x .180 front.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I like the U for fast sight pictures. But have been more accurate with the square notch. I agree with the “locking in” the sight picture
I like it.
Last edited by Craig@SSD; 10-04-2018 at 02:15 PM.
CraigR@ssdinternationalinc.com / 407-410-6914 Option 1 / About Us
What height front sight are you using on your gen 5?
.235 I believe
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you. I'll have to try my .235" again, it seemed to shoot low for me when I tried them the first time.
My Glock 19.5 after the second day of Gabe’s class this past weekend. This was after 400-500 rounds Sunday.
Approximately 2,600 rounds through the gun since Nov. Stock, except for a SCD, Dawson FO Fronts, Defoor Steel rears, a OEM plus sized Mag Release, and a Glockmeister plug. Shoots PoI=PoA if i do my job out to 25y. Cleaned after every Range session (uh, ok, mostly).
0 malfunctions.
Last edited by RJ; 10-05-2018 at 07:12 AM.
Stopped by LGS and they had two G5 MOS 19 pistols. Triggers were very good and excellent on the second pistol, with its trigger as good as on any stock Glock trigger I have felt. I grabbed it so I can switch parts between it and my various 19X pistols.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
I spend a lot of time anguishing over correct night sights, and wanting a U-notch for the new blaster.
Finally saying, "The hell with it," I bought a set of Truglo Tritium Pros. I confess I wasn't overly fond of the 3-dot system, but I did want to try something new.
I needn't have worried.
I tested out five carry loads, from Barnes 115 grainers to Winchester RA9B.
The general trend of the results were:
The 17.5 showed no real preference for any one loading. The inconsistencies were driven by one old, myopic shooter.
The sights were easy to pick up and reasonably fast. At ten meters, the shots were more or less two inches high, and that translated into roughly four inches high at twenty-one meters.
There were some standouts: The best showing of the test was two rounds of RA9B into a half inch, before human error expanded it to two and half inches
The Remington 124 grain +P Black Belt shot exactly to point of aim at 21 meters, generating a two and one group. This was a pity, since two of the rounds were almost on top of each other. The other round opened the group to three inches.
The only stoppage in the test was a round of WWB that peeled its brass back from the bullet upon chambering. Suffice to say I used some unsporting language while clearing it. It's hard to blame Glock for a Winchester error.
Reply With Quote