Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 72 of 72

Thread: Police Fitness Test Discriminated Against Women (CO)

  1. #71
    Site Supporter Drang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Pugetopolis
    Quote Originally Posted by punkey71 View Post
    As the older guys retire the newer folks will only know the lower standards and see them as the new norm and acceptable.
    This is the rationale behind age-based standards. You can easily, and accurately, argue that the job requirements don't change with age, but since our abilities do, having standards that recognize that fact continues to hold younger personnel to a more realistic standard of excellence...or minimum competence.

    As someone in another thread pointed out, lots of things have changed in the Army since I retired, but at that time both the "passing" and "maxing" standards on the APFT changed with age. My understanding is that the passing scores on the Marines PT test went down, but the max scores did not. (Or maybe it was the other way around? It's been a long time...)

    According to this article it looks like the Army is finally implementing changes to the PT test they first started talking about ten years or more ago, including having the "Combat Fitness Test" as well as a "PT Test."

    FWIW -- which is nothing -- my opinion is that having two tests is stupid. I'll head down to the Legion Hall now to perch on a bar stool and bitch about how easy these young punks have it thee days...
    Last edited by Drang; 07-19-2017 at 12:01 PM.
    Recovering Gun Store Commando
    My Blog: The Clue Meter

  2. #72
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    SoCal
    Quote Originally Posted by rjohnson4405 View Post
    I know a guy who was told to train a new graduate. Did so, and was fired to be replaced by the new grad. He was 60+.

    Accepted nothing (rule number one) on the way out, got a lawyer, and took very little effort to settle for ~30% of his yearly salary. Probably could've gotten more the but the lawyer thought costs would cut into and he wouldn't do any better.
    4 months' wages ain't so much when you're 60 and looking for a job.

    This is one good thing about the concept of company matching contributions to 401k (and whatever the government equivalent is ) plans. That's already sunk cost and no further pressure on the company bottom line.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

TLG 1970–2016 RIPRampageForTheCure.org