These guys sound like they take, "The Walking Dead," a bit too seriously.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These guys sound like they take, "The Walking Dead," a bit too seriously.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Vigilantes protecting their turf? Cool, I think I've seen movies about this before.
When stopping to fuel one's vehicle, at night, in some parts of the Houston* area, donning hard exterior armor and slinging a rifle is probably a reasonable idea.
Better idea: Monitor fuel levels, and plan fuel stops for daylight hours, in better parts of town. I am never going to tell someone not to be armored, so, wear low-profile armor as deemed necessary. Carry weapons with discretion, and, of course, be quiet about it.
*I am not picking on Houston; quite a few metropolitan areas have their Little Mogadishus.
You forgot to mention our favorite choir boy - after punching Zimmerman to the ground - fully mounted Zimmerman and bashed the back of his head into concrete giving him an "educational beatdown." That bashing of the head into concrete was the illegal use of deadly force. Travon didnt stand his ground, walk away etc while Zimmerman was on the ground. He became the aggressor and used illegal deadly force. Zimmerman shot him legally fearing for his life.
“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.”
George Orwell - “Notes on Nationalism”
I would consider a "herd immunity" mentality to be a safer operating method: I'll visibly show signs of protecting/patrolling my property, while others do the same, and everyone does so at random times. By doing that even those who don't partake would benefit due to presence of armed/active resistance in the area. I wouldn't draw down or shoot an active criminal on someone else's property, but I can certainly play the role of Good Witness and dial my phone. That overall may (or may not) have the desired deterring effect.