Page 7 of 44 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 438

Thread: Springfield XD-E??

  1. #61
    Has the gay LCI on top though




    Also look ath te brochure on the table, the grip looks SUPER skinny...like too much




    Per the Link:

    Looks like single stack
    NO Grip Safety
    Last edited by azerious; 04-27-2017 at 06:06 PM.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by breakingtime91 View Post
    that can't be real...
    I wish it wasn't...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAmJ8k_9Owg

  3. #63
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    The Keystone State
    Quote Originally Posted by LockedBreech View Post
    If you buy into SA's marketing, you kinda already are. (Not a PC joke but I couldn't help it)

    Edit: Since I'm going kinda hard on SA here, I absolutely love their rifles, their 1911s seem solid, I have always considered getting an XD-9 Service out of pure curiosity, and I'm not taking shots at anyone who likes their stuff. I just find the overly dramatic "legacy" marketing and pretending they're this ancient company very grating sometimes.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


    LB, I'm right there with you on SA. When I returned to the gun world, my first pistol was an XDS45, which, of course, was recalled. I never had any issues with it, had it back in less than a month and always thought it was a fine firearm. The "innards" of their guns are superior to many I've seen. I sold it to a trooper for the same amount I paid for it. Having said all that nice stuff, why in the hell they feel the need to keep naming their guns - or parts of their guns, is a mystery to me. I've picked up several of their recent offerings and just couldn't let myself get serious about a gun with childish names carved on them. I still think they make good firearms, but......they need to grow up a bit. Just my 2¢.
    Last edited by 11B10; 04-27-2017 at 06:16 PM.

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigfan26 View Post
    Doc Roberts can you please call this guy? Jesus..

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by breakingtime91 View Post
    Doc Roberts can you please call this guy? Jesus..
    He is still one of the best shooters on the planet. I would just avoid talking ballistics if I met him.

  6. #66
    Name:  FB_IMG_1493325686161.jpg
Views: 1136
Size:  17.7 KB

    Showed up on the Book of Faces today.

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigfan26 View Post
    He is still one of the best shooters on the planet. I would just avoid talking ballistics if I met him.
    Agreed, imagine if he used magic also

  8. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by lee n. field View Post
    Name:  FB_IMG_1493325686161.jpg
Views: 1136
Size:  17.7 KB

    Showed up on the Book of Faces today.
    Pass on the safety

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by breakingtime91 View Post
    Doc Roberts can you please call this guy? Jesus..
    And all the Timmies that saw that found immediate justification for carrying FMJ...I respect him as a shooter but that line of thinking about defense ammo is pure idiocy. It's 2017. We figured out how to make reliably expanding defensive ammunition. If he's worry about "magic bullets" jamming on him, maybe he shouldn't carry an XD.
    Shoot more, post less...

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by lee n. field View Post
    Name:  FB_IMG_1493325686161.jpg
Views: 1136
Size:  17.7 KB

    Showed up on the Book of Faces today.
    Name:  IMG_1846.jpg
Views: 1025
Size:  43.3 KB
    Shoot more, post less...

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •