Last edited by Default.mp3; 04-25-2017 at 10:30 AM.
Well...hallow point rounds I only use for defense against Nosferatu and other various and sundry revenants...
As for the others...well you can have both...that's why any of the rounds tested and verified as effective in both penetration and expansion have been kindly collated by Dr. Gary Roberts in his list.
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
This topic and this video have been previously discussed, as noted in multiple comments here: https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....-effectiveness
Dr. Andreas Grabinsky is an anesthesiologist whose very short 2011 lecture to EMT's at Harborview Medical Center is linked in the first post above; it is OK (you can see where he uses some of our data in the presentation), but it also contains a number of errors.
FMJ handgun projectiles typically deflect more against automobile windshields than barrier blind JHP.
Facts matter...Feelings Can Lie
I thought he was saying that ballistics gel does not do a good enough job. The thickness of the person and bones add in factors that decreased HP penetrating power. I don't remember mentioning JHP's at all, I am glad you use a better alternative than HP's because that is what we are discussing. Which kinda proves what he was saying anyways, since you guys know fully that JHP's are better than HP's, says something about HP vs FMJ.
He also went on to say that pistols RARELY ever go though people, they are likely not very wide buy have wirey frames. Full penetration of the body is not exactly what I would be worried about, missing shots like more of a big deal than worrying about something that never happens.
Is there any data about handgun penetration, and not people thinking it was penetration. He said frequently the person gets shot in the front and then turns around, getting shot in the back. Giving the illusion of an exit wound.
How many instances that have hard data that a pistol fired round penetrated the target and went on to hurt an innocent bystander?
Last edited by Thepig; 04-25-2017 at 02:37 PM.
Please do more research before posting on this topic, really it
has been discussed to death several times here.
To answer your question NYPD switched to Hollow points after the
Amadou Diallo fiasco. It is generally assumed that the
ricochet of the over penetrating police bullets caused the
officers to think that they were under fire and thus they added
more fire (41 bullets in all) into the unarmed man.
The change was highly controversial in NYC:
(Headline from NY Post) COMMISH ORDERS MORE VICIOUS BULLETS ;
MAKES SWITCH TO HOLLOW POINTS IN AFTERMATH OF SLAY
but the fact that they have not switched back, and as far as I know
all Police departments use them as well, should be a big clue.
Yes, Doc created the data and it is used in the lecture you providedIs there any data about handgun penetration,
Last edited by nycnoob; 04-25-2017 at 02:59 PM.
"To achieve any significant technological breakthrough, much Derp must be endured." -Rich@CCC
"Your shotgun is running a bit frenetic, you should add some lavender to your lubricant, that should calm it down." -Aray, Oils and Lotions SME
I know its generally assumed, but there are other people saying LE hits 1 out of 5 pistol shots.
I was lost in thought when I typed that sentence out, I was trying to refer to actual full penetration through bodies (proven exit wound), going on and hitting another target.
I've read quite a bit of data on this and most people with the data are saying the same thing. You should not be worried about the bullet exiting a person and be more focused on hitting your shots, specially with the horrible accuracy most LE's have in actual situations, not range.
It's a completely different round.
Last edited by Thepig; 04-25-2017 at 03:08 PM.