Yes
No
What's a hammer?
I'll carry anything, rocks and sticks included
I carry a DA/SA because that's what work gave me. I have come to appreciate the benefits of them, as many here have articulated. I do like the the 320.......LOVE the ergonomics of the M&P ( and how I shoot them).....And the Glock 19? I've owned 3. Realistically.....I'll end up carrying a Classic Sig of some kind in retirement.
Any legal information I may post is general information, and is not legal advice. Such information may or may not apply to your specific situation. I am not your attorney unless an attorney-client relationship is separately and privately established.
When I first started carrying back in the early '90s my choice was dictated to me, so a hammer-fired M9 it was. So by nature I tended to stick to hammer-fired pistols until 2005, when a hand injury and reduced grip strength forced me to reevaluate the Colt Lightweight Commander as my primary choice; I bought my first SFA, a Glock 23. However, the performance envelope left something to be desired, so I became an early M&P adopter. After regaining my grip strength, I returned to 1911s in 2008. However after a few more deployments and some discussions with others, I began to realize my beloved 1911 might not be the best tool, so I switched to a HK P30 LEM. However, try as I did over several different HK models, my shooting with the LEM was not up to par as I was with my 1911. Then I picked up a VP9. Wow! I have since been a SFA person. I still own hammer-fired pistols, but I carry striker-fired.
Well aware of the differences, the P99, and the history of the striker. Was sort of appropriating "hammer" and making it "TDA." I have no interest in guns with safeties but I understand if others do, and that's fine.
Just because it isn't a new invention doesn't mean it can't be the more modern solution. A parallel might be the bicycle, which is seeing a resurgence as a primary form of transportation in some metropolitan areas.
I have always heard the ignition reliability bit but never been able to find any actual data or evidence that would cause me to choose TDA over a striker. I would love to read anything people have on this subject.
I agree there are tradeoffs, I just see more tradeoffs with TDA (ok, and SAO or DAO) hammer-fired guns than I do with strikers.
Last edited by ScotchMan; 04-26-2017 at 07:54 AM.
Interesting, thanks. I used LEM for a couple years but ultimately ditched it because I convinced myself I cared about reset. That gun is a P2000sk, and at the same time I had also convinced myself (correctly) that I could carry a full-sized gun. If I had taken that opportunity to get a full-size P2000 I might be in a different place today.
Well...not to drop a rock in the pond, but as a noob, I've always wanted to ask this question:
draws breath
If you were designing a pistol "from the ground up", what would be the advantage of having two separate trigger pulls in the TDA pistol?
Are there any, at all?
I see most folks EDIT INSERT: here on p-f.com END INSERT operate SA/DA pistols just fine, and I get that if you have one, it requires decocking practice, etc. For purposes of this question, try not to look at TDA as something to be trained around, but as something that has a plus.
What is the plus?
I'm separating the trigger press out from the ignition method; so a DAK = LEM = G19 for this question.
Obviously if I'm asking a Stoopid question, just ignore it or tell me where I'm screwed up in my thinking...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Last edited by RJ; 04-26-2017 at 08:40 AM.
Same here. I was pinning the trigger and using reset to guide when to shoot again. If you do that with lem your going to have a really hard time doing anything with it. So I went for an easy fix, a g19. I don't 100% regret it but once again I went for a hardware fix when the p2000 was fine. As of right now I'm glad I didn't sell my p2000..