Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Gel vs water penetration?

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    south TX
    A fluid has less resistance than a solid.
    "It's surprising how often you start wondering just how featureless a desert some people's inner landscapes must be."
    -Maple Syrup Actual

  2. #12
    And so less resistance results in more deformation of the bullet?

  3. #13
    Site Supporter DocGKR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    You are dealing with a fluid which flows and cannot resist shear forces, thus altering the hydrodynamic drag as velocity decays.
    Facts matter...Feelings Can Lie

  4. #14
    Thanks, Doc. I was correct, in that I had a pretty good idea that the answer would involve concepts of physics far beyond my comprehension.

  5. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    South Central Us
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    You are dealing with a fluid which flows and cannot resist shear forces, thus altering the hydrodynamic drag as velocity decays.
    Maybe why people die so damn ugly when they jump from a bridge that's high enough over water.

  6. #16
    Site Supporter DocGKR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Exactly--jump from the same bridge with a parachute and the water does not feel so hard on impact...
    Facts matter...Feelings Can Lie

  7. #17
    Of course, the solid land of a drop zone doesn't feel nearly as hard if your chute deploys than if it doesn't so that wouldn't seem to be something unique to a fluid.

  8. #18
    Site Supporter DocGKR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Actually there is a dramatic difference....
    Facts matter...Feelings Can Lie

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    Actually there is a dramatic difference....
    You'd need to explain that to me, Doc. I am by no means a physics guy--I don't know what a shear force is--but I am an old airborne guy. I've seen guys survive both land and water jumps when their main chutes collapsed, and I've seen the contrary result (at least on land jumps). But I'm probably missing something.

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by tomjohnson View Post
    Water generally reveals the maximum upset which can occur to a projectile in soft tissue--the actual expansion in living tissue will be somewhat less. Water testing also can be used to get a rough estimate of bullet penetration depth in soft tissue--bullets penetrate approximately 1.6 to 2 times as much in water as in soft tissue.

    Considering the source, I am certain the above is true. Here is what I need help with, though. It seems as if upset and penetration should vary inversely. The more the bullet expands, the greater its frontal area, therefore the greater the drag, therefore reduced penetration. However this medium provides both more expansion and more penetration. How can this happen?
    As a typical handgun JHP impacts water (at typical handgun velocities), it encounters just about as much drag as it would upon impact in 10% ordnance gel. The drag forces, however, become small or even negligible, in water or gel, as the bullet slows down.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •