"Sapiens dicit: 'Ignoscere divinum est, sed noli pretium plenum pro pizza sero allata solvere.'" - Michelangelo
There's a guy round these parts who works for a local meat processing facility. He comes by with a special trailer for the carcass and a .22 rifle. Cow is down, gutted, and in the trailer in about 1/2 hour. Never seen him screw it up. He says you need to use solid bullets, I think he uses Remington Yellowjackets or Hornets, whichever is non-hollowpoint. Have to hit them in the "X" formed between the eyes and horns.
Last edited by Tabasco; 12-10-2016 at 04:45 PM.
The reason I switch sidearms for woods work is muzzle flash. It's entirely unscientific. I've seen more than one animal attempt to be scared off by a shot and whether or not they see the flash tends to determine whether they nope off or get more aggravated, or just stay put. My personal view, from examining a few brown bear and hog skulls is that any service caliber with decent ammo will penetrate sufficiently if the angle is right, which has a lot more to do with luck on the bounce of a charge (slight dips up and down, up slope or down slope, angle of fire) than marksmanship (as long as you hit the spot). Also why I practice moving to the right while firing when I'm practicing with my woods gun. I thought a few times about making a thread asking opinions but it seems a little thin for a whole thread, maybe it could tag on to this one.
To the 9mm vs. .45 question if you tagged a shoulder bone the extra mass might help. Otherwise I wouldn't expect much difference.