Damn, you're right. I is the dumb.
Damn, you're right. I is the dumb.
FORS - front opposite, rear same. For my small brain, I find this useful when dealing with iron sights.
I have a set of these in my hands now. Seem nice, but I'll know more once I mount them up.
Agreed. I've got a 10-8 setup with a fiber optic I'd rather have a trit/hi-viz front for. And the same with a set of warrens, actually.Originally Posted by littlejerry
--Josh
“Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.” - Tacitus.
Natchezss: HD-XR.
If it's an actual pic, then the rear sight appears to be same-ol', same-ol'.
Last edited by David S.; 01-13-2017 at 10:23 PM.
They aren't available yet but Natchez has pages for Glock, M&P, S&W SD, Shield, XD-S, XDM. $118.
Actually, they show in stock for Glock 42 & 43, but that could be an error.
https://www.natchezss.com/catalogsea...icon%20hd%20xr
Hope they make .230 fronts (stock is .215) for the Glock, or a bunch of Glock pistols will be shooting high.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
I just ordered a .156 10-8 rear for an M&P 2.0 I'll be picking up soon. If the XR fronts are available individually in the near future I'm going to try that setup.
Last edited by scjbash; 01-13-2017 at 10:59 PM.
I've found .245 tall fronts necessary on my 19 and 26 with 147gr pills. And that's with a 6 o'clock hold.
I didn't ask about that. My interpretation, right or wrong, is that its the same rear sight
I'll wager you a PF dollar™ 😎
The lunatics are running the asylum
Reply With Quote