Keep in mind these are the "training use" version. I'm guessing the real thing works more reliably.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Keep in mind these are the "training use" version. I'm guessing the real thing works more reliably.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Why spend the time and energy to test a known defective load?
Facts matter...Feelings Can Lie
When I can find a box of the new version 45 and/or 9 locally I'll pick one up.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
Yes, because .40 hurts my aging, aching right wrist. The quick fix was to revert to an all-steel 5" 1911 for personal-time carry; I had to keep carrying .40 on duty for another four years. (A 1911 has a lower bore axis than a P229, and that, plus the greater weight, means less recoil impulse, all else being equal.)
I will, however, be avoiding .45 ACP +P.
Last edited by Rex G; 12-17-2016 at 04:30 PM.
Somewhat off topic but have you used a 1911 chambered in 40S&W? I have one that I used for USPSA Single Stack. It has been perfectly reliable without loading long and using a variety of magazines. Recoil is easy to manage and you gain an additional round over 45ACP. And it still allows you to carry a pistol caliber that starts with a 4.
38 Super would also be a good choice if ammo makers showed it some support.
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
^This^
Initially the 124gr +P Gold Dot we issued was barely expanding and driving way down range after passing through bad guys. We talked to Speer about what we were seeing, they jumped on the redesign, what they did back then, maybe 20+ years ago, fixed the issue and what we see since then is as perfect performance as you can expect from a service caliber pistol bullet.
Last edited by Chuck Haggard; 12-18-2016 at 02:08 PM.
I am the owner of Agile/Training and Consulting
www.agiletactical.com