Ameriglo FBI Glock Contract Sights

[spinmove_]

The square notch are GL-956; it's unknown if they offer them at the present; they're no longer listed on the website or in the catalog. I bought a set in March of this year, factory direct for $99. ( GL-956 - Green tritium, orange outline 125" wide front sight. Green tritium, black outline serrated rear sight. Square .165" notch) If you're a member of GSSF they give a 10% discount too (Discount code is GSSF). I am not sure if the Gen 5's have a .140 or .125 wide front

Didn't know about the GSSF discount code. Hooray for GSSF memberships!


Sent from mah smertfone using tapathingy

[senfinger]

Anyone know if Ameriglo still has plans to make them for the 42/43? Been holding off on TrijHDs due to them performing surgery on Shirts and Skin = )

[ThatDude]

Have a pair of HDs on my 19. Recommendations to make the switch to these?

[GJM]

I’m not sure if this is been discussed in this thread, or another, but these “contract” sights seem to be coming with a .200 front when a .165 is needed for most to zero.

[rd62]

Yes, these have required a "drive the Dot" sight picture for my G17 and G19.

[GJM]

Yes, these have required a "drive the Dot" sight picture for my G17 and G19.

Maybe the FBI and Ameriglo got together, and decided to fix the Glock pointing high problem, with a .035 taller front sight.

[El Cid]

Maybe the FBI and Ameriglo got together, and decided to fix the Glock pointing high problem, with a .035 taller front sight.

I mentioned this in the Gen 5 thread too but the Feds use 147gr duty ammo. The sights were likely zeroed for that ammo. I know with my duty ammo (also 147gr) I had to get the .245" tall front with my HD sights to bring the hits down to POA/POI.

[GJM]

Kidding aside, in my experience a 19 and 34 require a taller than standard front, as does 147 grain, so maybe .200 is in there. Sure isn’t with a 17 and 124+P.

[JBP55]

Kidding aside, in my experience a 19 and 34 require a taller than standard front, as does 147 grain, so maybe .200 is in there. Sure isn’t with a 17 and 124+P.

The Glocks I have owned in 20+ years never required a taller front sight.

[Gio]

I'm OCD about my poi/poa being perfectly on the top edge of the front sight at 25 yds. My 19M was good with the .200". I've see a couple 19M's require a .180" front to raise the impact from behind the dot to the top edge of the sight.