Ameriglo FBI Glock Contract Sights

[voodoo_man]

These are the FBI? The look like a Trijicon HD with a toned down FS.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Yep.

Thinner front than HDs, rear is different too

[OnionsAndDragons]

The FBI sights are very much in a more refined direction from VDMs comparison pics.

Thinner front, better and non-stabby rear. That's a win all by itself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Cool Breeze]

CoolBreeze,
My TCAP mics at .122

As to the Operator pic, here you guys are!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Awesome that's what I thought same as mine. I'm assuming your operator is 140?

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

[Mitchell, Esq.]

I guess I'm the oddball.

I looked at the X-Ray sights on a Legion pistol - decided "NOPE" almost immediately. I don't like how the front doesn't catch the light and how hard it is to focus on the front when there is a lot of light in front of the gun.

I have trouble making out thin front sights. The HD's have been plenty accurate for me out to 25yds and do not find the rear sharp. I do not believe I would like the Ameriglo sights and have not liked the way an Ameriglo front sight disassembled itself on my 9mm Shield. They replaced it, but still...left me with a bad taste in my mouth.

[OnionsAndDragons]

Yeah. Standard OP front 0.165 h 0.140 w

Mitchell,
I don't have the stabby issue with HDs on SIGs. It's mostly a Glock problem for me. On HKs they are still very sharp but the fact that the rear is contained in the dovetail, it isn't so bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BaiHu]

Yep.

Thinner front than HDs, rear is different too

How are the rears different other than "not stabby"?

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[Slalom.45]

I apologize again as I've asked this before, but somewhere in the mix I missed the for sure and final specs for front and rear. Height and width. I probably just passed over it, but could one of you guys post it again please? Thanks...

[DocSabo40]

Yep.

Thinner front than HDs, rear is different too

So except for the front and rear sights, they are the same. The rear sight looks the same as the one on my Legion, just a little different in the notch and corners.

[voodoo_man]

How are the rears different other than "not stabby"?

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

The HD rears are sharp. Like blade tip sharp. They rip clothing and will cut your skin if you fail to rack your gun properly.

These are mostly rounded except for the notch part.

So except for the front and rear sights, they are the same. The rear sight looks the same as the one on my Legion, just a little different in the notch and corners.

Same but different?

When we talk about sights, the smallest difference is enough to make them their own animal.

[Mitchell, Esq.]

Yeah. Standard OP front 0.165 h 0.140 w

Mitchell,
I don't have the stabby issue with HDs on SIGs. It's mostly a Glock problem for me. On HKs they are still very sharp but the fact that the rear is contained in the dovetail, it isn't so bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

To everyone their own, but I never experienced the stabby/sharpness of HD sights on 2 glocks or an HK.