Originally Posted by
StraitR
The barrel life is a negative when compared to 308. That said, most calibers fall short compared to the relatively slow 30 cal when it comes to barrel life. I think .243 is like 1500 rounds, or close to it. Don't hear anyone complaining about it, because most people just shoot a a couple boxes a year zeroing/hunting. Firing schedule plays a big role too. If you're shooting for groups (a box or two over a couple hours), that's much different than practical rifle drills. I want to shoot a lot, without limitation, so that was a major factor in my decision to go 308 (along with bulk ammo price and availability).
When sitting down and defining my purpose, I decided that I don't have a need for the ballistic benefits of 6.5cm at distance, since my shooting will be <600m and in. In fact, most of that will be <200m. But that's me and my needs, goals, and purposes. I came to the conclusion that nothing really compares to 308 for scout/general purpose/practical rifle use. Different calibers for different purposes. I understand the lure of 6.5's softer recoil, especially if the goal is an ultra-light rifle. I think the CTR shoots great, but it's just over 10 pounds with my optic choice, Rhodesian sling, ITS stock pack, and empty mag. Add another 14oz with the suppressor, and 308 recoil gets pretty stinking mild. Wouldn't want to hump it up and down mountains though.
I considered a more price friendly Ruger American Predator too, but like you, automatically factored in a Magpul stock. That immediately puts you in T3X Lite pricing, and kills the "I'll save some money" vibe. Of course, the CTR is a couple hundred more, but I found it easy to justify vs the $700 RAR + Magpul stock combo.